Solving time: 10:38
Held up for a while at the end by 29, where was looking for ‘construction kit’ wordplay rather than a second def., and 5A which I’ve only just understood after much fruitless research about Thomas Hobbes and even Calvin and Hobbes.
Across | |
---|---|
1 | D(OLD=familiar)RUMS |
5 | HOBBES = “Hobbs” – Jack Hobbs, England test opener of the early 20th century, esp. in partnership with Herbert Sutcliffe. A long time ago, but he is one of the greats – “the only English cricketer and the only opening batsman to be selected as one of the five Wisden Cricketers of the (20th) Century” (Wikipedia) |
9 | GAB = rev. of (old) bag |
10 | CORKSCREWED – just a cryptic def., I think, with “twister” intended to mean “deceiver” in the surface meaning. |
12 | ILL-NATURED = (a duller nit)* |
15 | HAG(G.I.)S – “doughboy” for a US infantryman apparently goes all the way back to WWI. |
16 | NOSE=”knows”,GAY=pink. {“makes out” = knows} seemed a bit weak but the first words for know in COED are “be aware of”, which I guess is close enough to “make out” = discern. |
18 | MO(LIE)RE – more=again seemed iffy but is backed up by a COED def for more. Molière was a French dramatist – I think his Tartuffe still comes up in the grid, and we might get references to his Misanthrope or Malade Imaginaire |
20 | TREAT,Y – charade &lit. |
23 | R(O)AN |
24 | CARRYING ON – 2 defs |
26 | PASS THE BUCK – seems to just be a CD punning on plough = to fail an exam (dated Brit. colloq.) and dandy = buck. Not entirely sure where the “Oxford” fits in – “plough” is not Oxford jargon like “mods” |
27 | TUT(u) |
28 | RE,(k)NOWN |
29 | THE DERBY – def and cryptic def. – if a derby is a match between teams from the same town or nearby towns (Brit colloq., usu. football), then “the derby” transcends other such encounters |
Down | |
1 | DOGGIE = pet. DO=party,I in egg rev. |
2 | LOB,ELIA=essayist – old xwd favourite, nom de plume for Charles Lamb |
3 | RECTANGLES = (gents, Clare)* |
4 | MARQUIS DE SADE = (sad mad esquire)*. Not much of a def. here – surely there must be some cheeky possibilities. If you’re going to have him in the grid, you may as well get your money’s worth! |
6 | OKRA – hidden word. Same stuff as “ladies fingers” and bhindi. |
7 | BOW(L)ING |
8 | SIDE,WAYS=”weighs” – {side = |
11 | SEEING THROUGH = (thug he ignores)* |
14 | A STE(RISK)ED – charger = horse |
17 | IMP-ROPER |
19 | LIA(r),IS,ON=possible |
21 | TIG(H,T)ER |
22 | S(NOT=ton rev.)TY – “ton=(people of) fashion” is an old xwd standby – check your dictionary under “ton” if it’s new to you. As a def for snotty, watch out for “midshipman”, to go with jolly = a Royal Marine |
25 | S TO W = “veering through 90 degrees” |
All my sort of half queries are mentioned. I don’t really understand CORKSCREWED but it couldn’t be anything else, “Oxford” looks like padding at 26A and where is the real definition of MARQUIS DE SADE?
Age can be an advantage. My first cricket bat was “a Hobbs” and I used to oil it reverently. Is just “opener” as a definition really fair, I wonder?
Harry Shipley
Tom B.
Tom’s right in that a corkscrew is pulled up in a straight line; the way I looked at it is that the corkscrew itself is a twisted shape, whether you look at it top-to-bottom or vice versa. It didn’t strike me as all that good a clue. I haven’t come across “doughboy” before but it was an easy win from crossing letters.
I make that six of the last seven puzzles that I’ve completed inside fifteen minutes; to prevent me from getting too arrogant, the archive puzzle I printed out last night defeated me before I’d even got half way. *sigh!*
Pleased to see Haggis Nosegay, former lead singer of the Doldrums, and anti-hero of all goths over the age of 45, get a mention. Last heard on Singers of Renown on the ABC, with his death metal version of the mad scene from Lucia di Lammermoor.
I quite liked the homonym indicators in 5 and 16 ( they were both new to me at least) but I think 13, 17 and 27 were all old chestnuts.
Tom B.
Otherwise a fast (for me) 22 minutes. A very fair set of clues, with Peter comprehensively covering all of the minor quibbles. I suppose the fact that it was very fair also made it fairly boring.
I think the “in stew” part of “pods in stew” for okra is a bit superfluous. Perhaps it is padding to improve the surface gloss. Maybe the setter had in mind that okra is another name for the stew better known as gumbo. This was immortalised in Hank Williams’s song Jambalaya, a rich source of unusual words for crossword setters.
It would have helped if SIDE (8dn) had been clued more precisely. “Opener” for HOBBS (5ac), who retired 75 years ago, isn’t really cricket. I didn’t like the clue for CORKSCREWED any more than others did, but I think the point is that a corkscrew appears to go up or down depending on which way you turn it. Like linxit, I had to kick myself over OKRA.
Not much was new to me this time – only “doughboy” for GI (15ac) and DERBY (29ac) as a general term for a local match.
I think PASS (26ac) was clued with a definition by example: “Don’t plough Oxford [for example]”. I can’t accept Peter’s rationale for cluing KNOWS with “makes out” (16ac); could this be knowledge in the biblical sense? And it’s lame to clue TREATY using “deal” for TREAT (20ac), given the obvious relationship between the two.
Clues of the Day: 1ac (DOLDRUMS) and 25dn (STOW). I also liked the three clues identified by kurihan as old chestnuts: 13ac (VIEW), 27ac (TUT), 17dn (IMPROPER).
I also think that if the main sense of a word (“pass” in this case) is there, adding something like “at Oxford” to “Don’t plough” is a far more forgiveable form of D by E than “Oxford => UNIVERSITY”, even for those who won’t buy the latter.
“Know in the biblical sense”: seems no better – one may have “known her (or him) in the biblical sense”, but one doesn’t “make her/him out”, so it would plough the old subsitution test.
TREAT/TREATY: rock solid point – I’ve been moaning about this kind of stuff when moonlighting on Big Dave’s Telegraph blog, so I should have picked it up here.
Good clue = old chestnut: “if you’re going to steal, steal class” – I’m sure someone famous said that, though Google doesn’t confirm it.
Edited at 2009-04-01 12:15 pm (UTC)
I hesitated between ‘blowing’ and ‘bowling’ for a while before realizing it was a cricket clue. I also spent a while trying to justify ‘olio’ or ‘oleo’ for 6, before seeing that 10 must be ‘corkscrewed’. I hesitated over ‘sideways’ – is an ‘area’ really a ‘side’? As for ‘Hobbes’, I had no idea why, but that’s what it must be.
As for famous players of a previous generation, the NYTimes puzzle used to be fond of Mel Ott, often cluing him simply as ‘Giant’. He would make nice cryptic fodder, and we could baffle all the UK-based solvers.
The ‘no living people’ rule makes this kind of caper tricky to use in the Times puzzle, but a few ones like “Tangerine = MATTHEWS” might be on the cards (from the nickname of Blackpool FC).
He would make a great mOTTo or cOTTon in the cryptics.
5 seemed to me to be overly obscure – a philosopher we might not have heard of, combined with a cricketer we almost certainly haven’t – if it hadn’t been for Calvin and Hobbes, I would’ve been completely stuck!
COD – I’ve a soft spot for 4d.
I don’t really see a problem with the clue as a cryptic definition. To ‘corkscrew’ is to move in a spiral fashion (in any direction).
Corkscrew, pass and side were particularly unsatisfactory as has been said. Elia and ton were new to me and I fell foul of 5a plumping for Forbes as a likely contender with “for” satisfying the “as” bit and bes being… well, yes. Hum.
Q-2, E-4, D-5, COD improper. After Monday’s a-ha punk side project it was surprising to see another today – the bass player out of Sad Cafe having achieved a distinct lack of commercial success with The Snotty Doldrums.
Presumably none of you claiming never to have heard of Hobbes have either listened to Monty Python Australian philosophers (where he crops up in a list of philosophers who, after Hobbes, turn out to be cricketers instead) nor Slumdog Millionaire where he is the answer to one of the questions.
Class
I don’t think that Thomas Hobbes scored any centuries, although I believe he was fairly close to reaching the age of 100.
Steve W
‘pucking’ for 7dn before Hobbes went in was fun.
Today: 5ac’s reference to Jack Hobbs seems to me perfectly fair: the definition is ‘Philosopher’ and the rest relies on knowledge that really is I should have thought pretty mainstream: Jack Hobbs was one of the all-time greats and it is fairly well-known that he was an opener. 16ac is I’m sure a near-the-knuckle biblical reference: ‘knows gay’ comes from ‘makes out pink’. We refer to ‘the East Side’ when we are referring to a region of New York, so in 8dn ‘side’ = ‘region’ seems OK to me.
I don’t have a problem with “make out” for “know” in a knowledge sense; if you can make out the answer to a question or riddle, then you know what it is.
As someone with no more than a passing interest in cricket, why I should be expected to know the batting position of a player who retired more than a decade before I was even born (and that itself was over 60 years ago)is beyond me. But at least I recognised his name when I saw it. I’ve never heard of the one with the E.
But I would not go so far as to say the clue was unfair, just a little unkind.
R. Saunders
RS