1. Sale – double definition.
3. Air Force – service. Broadcast (AIR), supporting (FOR), church (CE).
8. Teashop – cafe. A delightful anagram (served mushy) of HOT PEAS.
10. Oasis – peaceful place. Old and relative (O SIS) taken round a (A).
11. In a nutshell – to put it briefly. Home (IN), anagram (turned out) of AUNTS (=A NUT S), a nightmare (HELL).
13. Galley – ancient boat. Anagram (remodelled) of LArGELY without the ‘r’ (not right).
15. Sphere – shape. (S)uper, gym (PE) which girl (HER) is getting into.
17. Mark my words – listen carefully. This seems like a pun/double definition of correct the vocabulary I use.
20. Exile – send away. Eleven (XI) in the Spanish (EL) and leagu(E).
21. Cartoon – drawing. Michelangel(O) put into box (CARTON).
22. Tightest – least relaxed. Homophone (we hear) of person from Bangkok (Thai = TIGH) before trial (TEST).
23. Bead – piece of jewellery. Debutante shortly (DEB) retires=BED clutching a (A).
Down
1. Sittings – sessions. Is painful (STINGS) to introduce (IT).
2. Llama – mammal. Rather gruesome image here. Picked up (upwards) of a (A) s(MALL) headless – without the ‘s’.
4. Impish – mischievous. Bantu warriors (IMPI), make less noise (SH).
5. Flower power – peace and love in the (19)60’s. I felt the answer was very gettable and liked the brevity of the word play – our rhymes showing – the two words of the answer (our) rhyme.
6. Rosalie – woman. I know that female names are not the favourite clue type for some of our posters but at least this one was definitively clued. Got up (ROSE) to protect former boxing champ (ALI).
7. Erse – language. Used by (in) writ(ERS E)xpressive.
9. House arrest – confinement. Anagram (awful) of OUR THERESAS.
12. Seasoned – maybe salty (food seasoned with salt). Waters (SEAS), one (ONE), avoide(D).
14. Lambing – helping with farm deliveries. Anagram (unexpectedly) of GLIB MAN. I turned up at some friends in NZ once and unexpectedly (not an anagram) got roped into helping to extract 150 eight week old and very boisterous lambs from ewes for inoculations (which I wouldn’t describe glibly as it was neither simple nor easy).
16. Smocks – items of clothing (possibly worn by a Wurzel when pretending to help with lambing). Hose (SOCKS) male (M) imported.
18. Rhône – French banker (river). About (RE) to receive (HON)our – only one half the word.
19. Heat – pressure (as in turn up the heat on). Former PM (HEAT)h – endless.
Whilst I’m here, I needed 11 minutes, missing my target yet again. I was held up by 15ac as my LOI.
Last two were sphere and heat.
For 15a I had speeve for a while, but it just looked wrong.
Glad to get Heath/heat clue, pm before I was born.
Lots of contenders for COD (lambing, rhone, seasoned) but I liked air force.
like the song The heat is on!
I raced through most of this but was then left chewing my pencil over a fair few tough (for me) nuts. Even after I’d worked out SEASONED I couldn’t for the life of me understand it – I could break it down but because I was reading “salty waters” for “seas” I was trying to see how SEASONED could = “maybe”. Eventually I wrote it in because the wordplay made it inexorable but I still had to come on here for the explanation, so thanks to Chris.
Like Flashman I dallied with speeve … got there in the end. And last that bloody banker.
So a tough solve for me today, but a good puzzle, thanks Flamande.
Templar
Thanks for the blog
No wonder I have heard from so many that don’t bother with them anymore as there is no progression over the week. More importantly over the last few months the supposed quick cryptichas been anything but.
These puzzles it seems are really aimed at experienced crossworders who complete in 10 min and seem to have a competition with themselves who can do it the quickest.
So if there really is an intention to develop new puzzlers start grading the puzzles so they get harder during the week not unsolvable from the start.
You don’t encourage anyone by making these so difficult that they are unsolvable even in part by those learning. Hard ok on occasion but not every day.
I am weary of this timing one-up manship. You are not true beginners, just old hands showing off.
So I now give my times in the QCs as a yardstick so that people who are aware of my ‘normal’ times can have some sort of feel of difficulty – others do the same which broadens how people, generally, have fared. You can then compare this to your own experience.
It’s a take it or leave it thing and given freely for the benefit of others. As such I do object to your description of a group of people who are purely solvers like yourself, but who are prepared to help others out on a voluntary basis.
Edited at 2017-11-29 03:15 pm (UTC)
In response to Anon’s comment above, this blog is called ‘Times for the Times’, so is about reporting our various times. What it isn’t, IMHO, is a competition between us, experienced or otherwise. I’d call myself experienced, but can’t get anywhere near the faster solvers times here, and definitely not on the 15 x 15, where my average time is more like 45 minutes.
I would ask Anon if having an easy puzzle on Monday, and (according to him) more difficult ones the rest of the week, isn’t what he is asking for, some sort of gradation across the week? However, I can’t ask as I don’t know who he / she is.
Publishing our times here is nothing to do with one-upmanship. It does allow us all, experienced and inexperienced, to get an understanding of how we are performing against others, and where we are on the cryptic learning curve. Coming across new or unusual devices are one way of learning and getting better / faster.
As a relative newcomer to the 15×15 (I’ve been doing—or at least trying—it regularly for about 18 months, I think) I do the QC to help me try different strategies, and to have a puzzle to do which I think should be within my grasp, which certainly isn’t always the case with the 15×15.
My times still vary wildly on both, and probably aren’t indicative of anything much, but I’m just in the habit of posting them in the 15×15 blog replies, where they seemed de rigueur among the regulars, and that was the case when I started doing the QC, too, so I didn’t really think twice about it.
There are certainly people doing the 15×15 daily who can put in the correct answers faster than I could even fill a QC grid with random letters, and I can see how that could be dispiriting, but perhaps I’ve just got used to it now! I actually find it rather inspiring. I certainly don’t think they’re “showing off”; everything I’ve seen tells me that the great majority of regulars are gracious types (and they’ll always spare some time to explain something to a newcomer…)
Edited at 2017-11-30 07:50 am (UTC)
As for my time on this crossword, it was about 6 minutes, so nearly a minute faster than average for me. Apologies if some here find that a bit intimidating, but I have had a lot of practice. Even so, coming here is always instructional – yes I do sometimes get stuck and not finish, or not understand a clue, and I try to give back with my own comments on what I liked or struggled with.
I was a learner too once, and I found the QC and this site brilliant for helping to learn the devices and conventions… without this I suspect I would still be struggling to finish more than a couple of days a week.
Edited at 2017-12-02 08:01 am (UTC)
I put the puzzle down and came back to it much later and was about to come here for the solution when a final alphabet trawl yielded Heath. So that was about another 20 minutes.
A good challenging puzzle. COD to 12d. David
Today was a dnf as I didn’t work out 18d banker=river, and was struggling to make re+obe into anything remotely possible… Thanks to the blog I just might not get caught out again. Thx to Chris and the contributors for the insights, and Flamande for an enjoyable hour in Costa this evening!
FOI 1a LOI 15a COD 22a
Puzzling over 18d pushed me over the hour before I gave up and came here.
I’ve never been good at filling in the blanks when you can’t get the first letter….