Times 26,951: Reverend Spooner’s Free Hosiery

78 comments on “Times 26,951: Reverend Spooner’s Free Hosiery”

1. 12d is just KNOCK FOR SIX so no more Ss required!

   This was definitely on the easy side and a PB for me at 33:21.

   COD 21a closely followed by 25a.

   Hopefully the rest of the day will go this well as I’m well and truly ready for the weekend.

   Thanks for the blog.

   1. And another PB being the first to comment!!! It just gets better and better.
   2. Haha, thanks! I guess I should do less parsing at one in the morning, I’d probably be less unfairly grumpy about the puzzle if I did as well! Sorry unfortunate setter.

      Parsing/blog shamefacedly corrected.

2. As with Verlaine, I found this quite a “vanilla” puzzle, enjoyable enough but with little out of the ordinary to pass comment on. COD to ARMS LENGTH as I liked its construction.

   Well done to Mr Chumley on the PB.

   1. Thanks pootle
3. The top half was straightforward but I slowed down a lot, taking ages in the SW corner and to spot the definition, and hence answer, at 19ac.

4. Leisurely solve, ending like Jack with RATLIKE. I too was mildly troubled by the KNOCK rather than ‘knocks’ at 12dn. Thanks, V, and well done on your quizzing!

5. Not a PB for me: no struggle but just a painstaking straight through solve requiring 24 minutes.
   CLOTHES PIN delayed for a while, possibly because we always called them pegs: the unusual use of thespian was clever enough to make me wonder whether the setter had been saving it up.
   RATLIKE turned out to be my last, even though I could see what was supposed to be going on, the kilt bit and the definition didn’t come to mind. In (some of) the dictionaries, ratlike seems to have more to do with appearance than behaviour.
   I liked (once I understood it) the cryptic-clue-as-answer SUN-UP
   1. It’s quite oblique, isn’t it – I like that you can sort of see how, e.g. a love rat isn’t true, but you have to squint. I guess I like squinty clues…
      1. A bit too oblique, I felt. One of those clues you solve correctly but which leaves a lingering sense of dissatisfaction because the definition doesn’t really work.

         I also thought “crooks” questionable as an anagrind at 8dn.

         Certainly, one of the easier Friday offerings. 24dn was indeed clever.

6. Everything done bar RATLIKE in 25 minutes, finally gave up after another ten. I’m hoping it’s just the man-flu that’s producing this run of DNFs for me…
   1. I’ve got it too Matt; can’t shake it off – it’s a swine. Sympathy 🙂
7. With RATLIKE biffed. Have I missed something as “not true” does not equate to “ratlike”, does it?
   1. If you think of true in the loyal sense, and rat in the James Cagney sense?

      Edited at 2018-02-02 09:30 am (UTC)

      1. Thank you. Now I see it. I wonder sometimes how I miss the blindingly obvious.
         1. Not that obvious, especially since it’s wrong. See my comment way down there on the page…
      2. Re your def for RATLIKE: That’s what I was thinking at first, but it wasn’t convincing. See my comment near the bottom of the comments.
         1. From Collins:
            Rat: a person who deserts his or her friends or associates, esp in time of trouble.
            True: unswervingly faithful and loyal to friends, a cause, etc.
            Can’t see the problem.
            1. Only the setter and (presumably) the editor know for sure.

               But someone who isn’t true, in that sense, isn’t “ratlike.” He’s a full-blown rat, in the Cagney sense. No sense in having “like” then.

               1. What’s the difference? A rat behaves in a ratlike manner. It’s perhaps very mildly oblique but that’s what the question mark is there to indicate.
                  1. The difference is merely a matter of grammatical rigor, in a kind of puzzle that rather depends on that. Its being in any degree “oblique” Is not the problem. I would find it disappointing if your explanation is what the setter intended. I know why you think the question mark is there, but it goes just as well with my interpretation.

                     Edited at 2018-02-02 07:30 pm (UTC)

                     1. If RATLIKE is supposed to mean ‘not a true rat’ then it needs some reference to rats in the definition. To omit this is surely a greater leap than the assumption that a rat can be said to be like a rat (which incidentally is a matter of semantics rather than grammar, surely).
                        1. I was thinking of the syntax of the clue, and I keep seeing GRAMMAR on this page, but, yes, the meaning of RATLIKE is semantics.
                           I thought of the “Cagney” interpretation first, and was dissatisfied for the reason I have been at pains to explain.
                           That might be part of it, I’ll allow, but it seemed there should be something more to make it clever (which, otherwise, it ain’t very).

                           Edited at 2018-02-02 07:53 pm (UTC)

8. … be grateful for a less demanding Friday. 19 minutes which would have been quicker if I’d not carelessly put in clothes-peg first. As with others, LOI RATLIKE. COD KNOCK FOR SIX.Thank you V and setter.
9. Hello, just bitten the bullet and paid for a Times subscription. Can access the puzzle once more- used to subscribe to the crossword club until they closed that. How do I print out the puzzle? I like paper and pen solving. Couldn’t work out this morning how to print and was time pressured for work.
   Regards
   Andrew K
   1. Hi, Andrew. If you access via the Club there are Play Now / Stats / Print options underneath the puzzle number. But if you approach via the Puzzles section in the on-line newspaper you have to select Play Now to open the crossword and then the Print command is to be found by clicking the ‘hamburger’ icon above the clues. Welcome back, btw.

      Edited at 2018-02-02 10:21 am (UTC)

      1. Thank you very much Jack. I’ll try that later.

         Andrew

         1. Also, if you go in by the Club entrance you can chose PRINT instead of PLAY right on the sun page
10. 12m. No problems today, thankfully. I was in the mood for something vanilla after yesterday.
    I can’t see the problem with 12dn: it seems to have the right number of Ss in all the right places.
    1. It’s me who doesn’t have the right number of Ss in all the right places, it turns out! (Perhaps I can turn this phrase into the new “a few sandwiches short of a picnic”…)
11. Yes, the definition in 12d is ‘strike’ and the wordplay works. Took a while to see UFOS. LOI RATLIKE constructed from wordplay and only now get the definition. And what is a CLOTHES PIN? 27’, thanks verlaine and setter.
    1. I see we had the same word association to ‘gladsome’. It was a staple in our primary school morning assembly. I’d never called it a clothes-pin either. I seem to remember an Agatha Christie where the maid was killed and a clothes-peg put on her nose.
12. Like V I found this a bit mechanical – as if a computer had set the clues. I felt as if I trudged through it never really getting out of second gear. Pure vanilla.
    1. I was talking with some non-logodaedal friends about crosswords and the remuneration setters receive for them – as computer nerds they got quite excited about the possibility of using machine learning to generate them automatically for £100 a pop (or whatever the going rate is these days). I assured them that no machine could achieve the requisite level of poetry of a good crossword clue! But probably technological advances will prove us wrong within a few years.
       1. Indeed – who can say (and I’m not going to say it will never happen) but I would question “a few years”

          To develop genuine creativity will I suspect take a huge amount of time and money – resources that can better be deployed on fully utilising artificial intelligence in more straightforward applications

          Creativity is what we humans are best at so currently the best combination is using us to be inventive and the machines to do the analysis

          I’m out of touch now but it certainly used to be the case that when simulating war games the Spanish, French and Germans always win at Trafalgar, Waterloo, and the Battle of Britain!

          1. For a non-cryptic like the Concise it should be relatively straightforward to generate, but good cryptic clue-writing is a skill that machine learning cannot crack as it requires an understanding of semantics to write a decent surface. If you are interested in this, here is what you get when when you get machine learning to write a Harry Potter sequel… Botnik Harry Potter. It’s a good laugh!
13. Agree with above, easy for a Friday, with RATLIKE the only odd / slightly guessed last entry. 21 minutes.

    Nice clean formatting Verlaine; I think in your preamble 19dn should read 19ac. Pip

14. 18.12 (cue music) so about the same as yesterday’s much harder offering. The difference was the time taken to sort out RATLIKE, my LOI. Otherwise not one that will linger long in the memory.
15. Unlike my esteemed co-bloggers I found the bottom half rather chewy, with several DNK’s including ECON, CLOTHES PIN plus rather stuck looking for a religious centre (something like a sanhedrin maybe?) instead of the SYNDROME. And aren’t characteristic events plural? RATLIKE completely confused me.
    1. A group of symptoms or behaviours is certainly more central to the meaning of syndrome than events, but maybe a dictionary out there supports the latter.
16. 24 min 50 secs with one wrong. Ratrime for Ratlike.
17. Well, I a) found this quite tough and b) enjoyed it. The occasional John Henderson is quite enough for the likes of me. 41 minutes.

    Edited at 2018-02-02 11:11 am (UTC)

    1. Looking up “occasional table” I see the definition “a small decorative table for infrequent and varied use”, which presumably makes JH “a small decorative setter for infrequent and varied use”?
       1. Ah, now, he’s not *that* small!
18. I think I had a similar reaction to many others, except that the word that sprang to mind was “efficient”, rather than vanilla. Taking the long view, it shows how high the standards of the crossword are that for an offering to be merely workmanlike can be considered a bit of a disappointment. And yes, I ended up with RATLIKE as well.

    Edited at 2018-02-02 11:36 am (UTC)

19. Beaten by RATLIKE, alas.
20. 32 min, with around 5 min spent on 19ac – almost entered RATAILE in desperation, as possibly some sort of skirt, not to be found in the usual sources.
    I notice that Chambers does not actually list RATLIKE as a word, even though it uses ‘rat-like’ in several definitions ! (Hence mechanical aids don’t find it.)
    1. I considered RATAILE too, before seeing RATLIKE.
21. 16:11 with 4 or so minutes of that struggling to get syndrome and then, of course, ratlike.
22. I found the top half straightforward enough but was delayed by the southern sectors. It took me an age to see UFOS, and then only after I got the O from 12d, despite having been scanning for a hidden. I did like 12d once I saw it by separating the S from the KNOCK. I was also put off the scent by the unusual CLOTHES PIN where I’ve always know it as a PEG. My FOI was ARC and, like a lot of others, my last was RATLIKE. 35:47. Thanks setter and V.
23. ….but I found the bottom rather tough. I couldn’t even see ‘arms length’ and ‘instrument panel’, which are really quite easy, and came home in 33 minutes. The only one that really should have been tough was ‘ratlike’, a clue in a more difficult style than the rest of the puzzle.

    We never say ‘clothes peg’ in the US, it’s always ‘clothes pin’, which can even be one word.

    Edited at 2018-02-02 01:13 pm (UTC)

24. I found this almost a straight write-in until I hit 19a, where I was slow to see the wordplay and shrugged at the definition as ‘not true’ – then concluded it works quite well in the context of a ‘rat run’, which would hardly follow a direct or true course.

    Gandolf34

25. 24 mins. The old story with me; physically writing answers in slows everything up cos of the ET; the actual solve time is a lot shorter. So much quicker online, but that doesn’t help me to practise for competitions. RATLIKE held me up for about 6 mins; got a bit stuck trying to shoehorn mini or midi into the answer. Thought the definition was a bit wacky, notwithstanding the question mark. Thanks to setter, though, no offence intended – enjoyed the challenge. Cracking blog, V, thanks.
26. Similar experience to others: easyish but defeated by 19a in what would otherwise have been a fast time for me.
27. Also defeated by RATLIKE, never thought of skirt=kilt, and thought ‘skirt’ was the definition. Rats, as they say. Yes, as vinyl says, a CLOTHESPIN is the common US label for that thing, but the UK side was represented by the unfamiliar, to me, spelling of GRAMME in 1D (we spell it as GRAM), so I had to enter GRAMMAR without understanding the parsing at all. Regards.
28. My LOI was RATLIKE too. I don’t think anyone has finished parsing this here (excuse me if I simply missed it). Wikipedia entry for “rat”: “”True rats” are members of the genus Rattus, the most important of which to humans are the black rat, Rattus rattus, and the brown rat, Rattus norvegicus. Many members of other rodent genera and families are also referred to as rats…”—but are not “true” rats, merely RATLIKE.

    Edited at 2018-02-02 05:47 pm (UTC)

    1. This clue has nothing to do with rodents. It beat me entirely so thank you to the setter and keriothe.
       See keriothe’s reply to me about Cagney and loyalty.
       1. That the clue has nothing to do with rodents is the devious thing about it, I’d say.
          If a person is a rat in the Cagney sense, there’s no need for “like.”
          I’d like to hear from the editor on this.
29. Surprised to see that no one has commented on 10 ac being apposite to today’s date, being the 66th anniversary of Her Majesty’s accession to the throne, if not her ‘ascent’ (which perhaps connotes coronation). Nonetheless surely not a coincidence by the compiler? Bas from Belsize.
30. RATLIKE is plainly the intended answer, OK. But to define it with “not true?” is frankly rubbish, whatever sense the setter may have had in mind for “true”. Not for the first time here, I appeal to the setters and their boss to understand that the English language isn’t indefinitely extensible just to suit some crossword setter. There are limits even for that peculiar trade, and this clue was plainly far beyond them.
    1. True means loyal. A rat is a disloyal person. There’s no need to extend anything: this is just the plain meaning of the words.
       1. So a “ratlike” person would be one who is “like” a disloyal person in some sense, but not really disloyal?
          1. By this standard a lady would be incapable of ladylike behaviour. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck… it logically cannot be a duck.
             This seems an unduly nice distinction to me.
             1. That doesn’t follow. Nice distinctions, though, are what cryptic clues are made of.
                A real rat, the four-footed mammal, is not disloyal, as far as i know. But humans rather unfairly typify as “vermin” the less shining exemplars of our own species. We don’t say they are “ratlike” (rats aren’t really like that). We simply call them rats. A person you can’t trust or rely on, a traitor, a backstabber… is not “ratlike” but the real thing, in the (speciesist) metaphorical sense in which we use the word.

                Actually, if you think both interpretations simultaneously, it makes “not true” a pun.

                Edited at 2018-02-02 07:41 pm (UTC)

31. Like everyone, RATLIKE went in last. Unlike everyone, it went in from the definition, and I came here for the wordplay—so I can’t see why all the fuss over the definition
32. 32:19. FOI 1ac. Had most of this done in 25 mins not much thinking or stretching of the brain cells required. As with others, the LOI and only one that wouldn’t yield without rolling up the sleeves, putting in the hard graft and solving it the old-fashioned way with an alphabet trawl and a bit of elbow grease for a four-letter “-i-t” word for “skirt” inside “ear”, reversed was of course 19ac. Got there through wordplay and squinted at it hard enough to justify its apparent obliqueness. Now I have seen Keriothe’s comments the definition is not as oblique and squinty as first I thought.

    Edited at 2018-02-02 09:31 pm (UTC)

33. I think they reduce the oxygen on airplanes and that it make you stupid. I wrote the top half in bang bang bang whilst sitting at the gate. The bottom, after we got to altitude, was challenging. I admit that sometimes happens in my very own home (slightly more often in my favorite pub), but it’s rare that I can’t solve a huge chunk of puzzle mostly because I scratch in the word-break bars and hyphens in the wrong place at every single chance. Every single chance.

    Edited at 2018-02-02 09:41 pm (UTC)

34. About 35 mins at 5:00 UK time this morning in a Munich hostel.
    Now home (Edinburgh) from my ski week.
    As has been said above, you either liked Ratlike or you didn’t. I didn’t.
    Thanks setter and V.
35. 16:38.Late to the party again. All done in about 12 minutes but then got stuck on CLOTHES PIN and RATLIKE.. and I see I wasn’t the only one. I thought this was quite fun albeit not very demanding. COD to 21a
36. What a lot of comment about this word. But so far as I can see nobody has mentioned that it isn’t in either Chambers or Collins. OK rat-like is used from time to time in Chambers, but the clue says (7) not (3-4) so this doesn’t count. It looks as if the setter has made up a word and then said what it means (‘not true?’), which looks highly dodgy to me.
37. mi nombre es brandy
    tengo un testimonio para compartir, soy de texas. Deseo compartir con ustedes la forma en que obtuve una TARJETA ATM que cambian mi vida de manera atómica y que pude pagar todas mis deudas en 3 meses.
    entré en contacto con MR Donald de fastlinkhackersweb.co@gmail.com cuando estaba buscando un trabajo en línea y él me contó sobre esta TARJETA y también dijo que la tarjeta puede retirar hasta $ 15,000 por semana y que podría ayudarme a comenzar un mejor vida y ayúdame a pagar todas mis cuentas.
    él me dijo que la TARJETA era ilegal y que tenía que ser inteligente en otra para usar la tarjeta. Decidí intentarlo y me dijeron el procedimiento a seguir e hice lo que me dijeron que hiciera y en 72 horas recibí un paquete que contenía una TARJETA y una guía del usuario. desde ese día comencé a usar la TARJETA y ha sido una bendición para mí.
    si desea ponerse en contacto con MR DONALD para obtener una tarjeta, contáctelo a través de
     fastlinkhackersweb.co@gmail.com
38. Here is a good news for those interested. There is away you can earn money without stress contact (CLIFFORD JACKSON) for a blank [ATM CARD] today and be among the lucky ones who are benefiting from this cards. This PROGRAMMED blank ATM card is capable of hacking into any ATM machine anywhere in the world. I got my the card from a good Hacker on the internet, with this ATM Card I am able to collect $5000-$20,000 dollars every day via contacts: {cliffordhackerspays@gmail.com}….I was very poor but this card have made me rich and happy, If you want to get this opportunity to become rich then apply for this card, I am so happy about this because i got mine last week and I have used it to get $240,000.00 dollars CLIFFORD JACKSON Hackers is giving out the card just to help the poor and needy and they ALSO OFFER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE. Get yours from CLIFFORD JACKSON Hackers today. Kindly contact them by Email cliffordhackerspays@gmail.com
39. 
    Have a great day

    I’m Richard Cosmos private lender. I am offering a loan with an interest rate of 2% per annum and in the amount of 2000 euro – 500,000,000.00 euro It has 100% equity financing with secured and unsecured loans. We guarantee our financial services to many of our global customers. With our flexible loan portfolio, loans can be processed and transferred to borrowers in the shortest time possible. We operate under clear and understandable terms and we provide all types of loans to interested clients, companies, corporations and all types of businesses. Contact us now at: (richardcosmos5@gmail.com)

    Offer urgent loans.

40. THE PRACTICE LOAN COMPANY PLC is a British based financial consulting company with years of experience in the international and local finance market. Be it lease bank guarantee, Stand by letter of credit or any type of refinancing, talk to our team at THE PRACTICE LOAN COMPANY PLC and certainly we will set your business on the right path with our sound and quality financial advice and services.

    Our bank instrument can help you fund your projects in Trading, funding project(s) such as Aviation, Agriculture, Petroleum, Telecommunication, construction of Dams, Bridges, Real Estate and all kind of projects.Having years of professional, invaluable experience in the banking and finance industry, and having access to dozens of different prominent trusted and reliable providers, our Financial Services consultants will crawl through hundreds of products to find one that perfectly matches your needs.

    Purchase Instrument of BG/SBLC : 38%+2% Min Face Value cut =5M- 10B EUR/USD

    Lease Instrument of BG/SBLC : 6%+2% Min Face Value cut = 5M- 10B EUR/USD
    DESCRIPTION OF INSTRUMENTS:

    1. Instrument: Bank Guarantee (BG / SBLC) (Appendix A)
    2. Total Face Value: Eur 5M MIN and Eur 10B MAX (Ten Billion USD).
    3. Issuing Bank: HSBC Bank London, Barclays, Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank Frankfurt.
    4. Age: One Year, One Month
    5. Leasing Price: 6% of Face Value plus 2% commission fees to brokers.
    6. Delivery: Bank to Bank swift.
    7. Payment: MT-103 or MT760
    8. Hard Copy: Bonded Courier within 7 banking days.

    Name: Paul Christopher

    Email: thepracticeloancompanyplc@gmail.com

41. Nebankovní půjčka za 48 hodin. Potřebujete financování Pro váš dům, Pro vaši firmu, Chcete-li koupit auto, Chcete-li koupit motocykl, Chcete-li vytvořit vlastní firmu, Pro vaše osobní potřeby nepochybujte. Nabízím osobní půjčky od 10 000 Kč do 50 000 000 Kč s roční úrokovou sazbou 2%. Nezáleží na výši. Ve své žádosti o půjčku uveďte přesnou částku, kterou chcete uplatnit, a datum splacení. Napište nám své osobní půjčky e-mailem: sopuchmichal2@gmail.com whatsapp +42072353979
42. ARE YOU WILLING TO HIRE THE REAL HACKERS TO GET YOUR CYBER PROBLEMS FIXED WITH SWIFT RESPONSE?
    AND ARE YOU A VICTIM OF THE BINARY OPTION SCAM?
    Solving a problem for which you know there’s an answer is like climbing a mountain with a guide, along a trail someone else has laid.
    Here is a defined platform that maps a positive step closer to surviving heavy threat on the internet. You can put a stop to your anxiety and constant fear of you getting ripped off by forgeries. 
    This post is actually for those who are willing to turn their lives around for the better, either financial-wise or relationship-wise or businesses.
    Our primary reason for this development is to ensure that those in need of help don’t get ripped off by forgeries.
    This is a global idea that navigates a newbie to a prominent encounter ( Fully immersed to a degree that the subject in question Is a disorienting worthwhile experience on merits).
    Who are the GlobalHackers?
    We are group of skilled professional hackers driven by passion to make the internet a safer place and render proficient services to those having cyber problems.
    Globalhackers has grown and expanded since it formation over the years due to the experience and professionalism of our management and technical staff. Our strength is based on our ability to bring together active cyber security professionals who individually has acquired enormous exposure in the world of HACKING
    As part of our corporate goals, providing value added services to meet our client needs and requirements has been our sustaining impetus.
    The new development on the Globalhackers platform is to assign to you the right HACKER to deal with your Particular kind of cyber issues depending on the kind of cyber problems you are willing to get fixed.
    Here, you would be refer to a legit professional hacker known for massive skills and security abilities.
    Skilled and trained on
    ▪Social media hacks (facebook, twitter, instagram,snapchat)
    ▪Email hacks
    ▪phone hacks
    ▪bitcoin hacks.
    ▪verified PayPal account hacks
    ▪database hacks
    ▪credit card top up
    ▪university score upgrade
    ▪money transfer
    ▪binary option funds recovery. ( recovered $4,372,063 million)
    The binary option scam is another problem facing the internet today.
    How do you avoid binary option scam and what do you do if you are a victim of the scam.
    Be wary of adverts on the internet and mostly on social media promising high returns from binary options trading. The binary option is one of the highly recorded scam on the internet.This are a form of fixed-odds betting.
    People investor their hard earned funds in the scammers website and at the end, they wouldn’t be able to take their profit plus their investment too. The Globalhacks are breeding effort to put an end to these unbearable swindle scheme taking over the intenet and taking a solid step forward to render solution to those affected by the fleece… we have striven to make tenacious effort to relief those who were victims off their traumatic feeling of loss. ( We Are Here To Help Recover Your Stolen Funds).
    Here would be our cybersecurity techniques to retrieving back the victims stolen funds.
    ●The binary broker website would be traced down using a game over peer to peer network via a bug attack,
    The bug network secure an SQL trace on a hiding server, decentralizing it and redirecting the server to a soft plus network. A soft plus network enable varieties of unique web coding languages, Through that process reveals thier hidden networking source, displaying the changed web page made default.
    This unveil the hiding information traceable to track down the scammers and their embezzled central fund reserve system.
    HOW DO YOU STAY AWAY FROM FALSE BUSINESSES ONLINE?
    * Making enquiries for their firm reference number (FRN)
    * Contact details and barter their calls on the switchboard number and also
    * Never make use of the link in a website or an email from the firm propitiating you for an investment.
    For more enquiries and help, contact:
    Info.globalhacks (at) gmail. com
    globalhacktech (at) protonmail. com
    HackerOne©️LLC 2030.
43. We have a direct genuine provider for BG/SBLC specifically for lease, at leasing price of 4+2 of face value, Issuance by HSBC London/Hong Kong or any other AA rated Bank in Europe, Middle East or USA.

    Contact : Mr. DARREN C CHENG
    Email: Darrencraig002@gmail.com
    skype : keatcheng2@gmail.com

    Intermediaries/Consultants/Brokers are welcome to bring their clients and are 100% protected. In complete confidence, we will work together for the benefits of all parties involved.

    All inquires to Mr. Darren should include the following minimum information so I can quickly address your needs:

    Complete contact information:
    What exactly do you need?
    How long do you need it for?
    Are you a principal borrower or a broker?

    Contact me for more details.

    Whatsapp: +19733700521

44. Bitcoin is the future world currency and businesses, due to this many has fall a victim to scammer’s while some can’t even access there bitcoin Wallet due to one reason or the other. Good news contact M&D group of hackers Team For Quality jobs Delivery, University Grades. Loans. Wiping Criminal Records. iClouds Breaching YouTube and Phones Hacking!!! We have help Individuals Organization to Secure and to Recover there lost Files/Password/ Bitcoin and funds etc. We Are Hacker 4Hire Email:- pointekhack@gmail.com‬ ‪hyperhackerone@gmail.com
    cyberhackertap@gmail.com

    HOW WE WORK? First Your complaint will be attend immediately and if busy we link you to a Guru experts base on the field job you reported and a procedure will be implemented according to the way it’s best for the job

Comments are closed.