13:11, so not outlandishly difficult based on that criterion (not to mention someone from these parts already solving considerably quicker); and a smooth solve with everything safely worked out before submitting. As always, your mileage may vary, depending on your personal knowledge of Aristotle, the language of Robert Burns, and card games; though I don’t think the vocabulary was especially tricky. Whether I’m right or not will soon become clear.
Across |
1 |
KINSWOMAN – IN(=at home) in (MONKWAS)*. |
6 |
BASIS – 1 in the BASS voice. |
9 |
DOWAGER – WAG(=shake) in DOER(=active type). |
10 |
SHOWN UP – double def. |
11 |
SWOON – W{ife} in SOON. |
12 |
LANDOWNER – where LAN stands for Local Area Network; so if you did terminal mischief to one, you’d be a “LAN DOWNER”, geddit? |
13 |
FORTIETH – (TOFITHER)*, with ruby being another way to express a 40th anniversary. |
14 |
DRAB – (BARD)rev. |
17 |
LATE – {e}LATE{d}. |
18 |
BADINAGE – IN{n} inside [B{ritish} ADAGE]. At first I feared this was going to feature the dread word “banter”. |
21 |
HALF TRUTH – veracity = truth, so our Vera is only half of that. |
22 |
SO FAR – F{eminine} in SOAR. |
24 |
UNITIES – UNI{versity) TIES(=associations); the unities are the dramatic rules laid down in Aristotle’s Poetics. |
25 |
GO ROUND – double def. “Last out” as in “I hope there’s enough wine to go round”. |
26 |
EAGLE – E{nglish}; AGLE{y}, a word I know (as does probably everyone else who happens to know it) from Burns’ words To a Mouse i.e. “The best laid plans of mice and men gang aft agley”. |
27 |
SINGLETON – double def., “one in a suit” being in the card-playing sense, where it means a single card of a particular suit in a hand. |
|
Down |
1 |
KUDOS – (SUDOKU)*. |
2 |
NOW YOU’RE TALKING – a double definition with the cryptic element not being very cryptic. |
3 |
WAGON-LIT – (ALONG)* in WIT. The train sleeping-car sounds even more exotic when rendered in French. |
4 |
MORALITY – lift and separate to get the definition “Good conduct”, and it’s M{ark}, O{ver}, R{E}ALITY minus the E. |
5 |
NOSING – 27ac is SINGLETON; if you want to turn that into “admitted”, i.e. LET ON, you take off the first bit, so there’s NO SING. |
6 |
BOO-BOO – BOO{k} x2. |
7 |
SAN ANDREAS FAULT – (LAASUNDERFASTA{california}N)* &lit. Very clever. |
8 |
SEPARABLE – StEeP, ARABLE. |
13 |
FULL HOUSE – double def. More cards, where a full house is three of one rank and two of another in poker; and the theatrical sense. |
15 |
PATHOGEN – THO'(=but) in PAGE N, i.e. an unspecified page. |
16 |
MINSTREL – MINSTER (=church) with the tail turned to become MINSTRE + L{eft}. |
19 |
STRIKE – S{on} + TRIKE. |
20 |
CURSES – the curé is the French parish priest; put {pray}S in CURES to get the swearing. |
23 |
RADON – R.A.(=Royal Academy) DON(=lecturer) gives the radioactive gas. |
CURSES! my last one in; also very well constructed.
MINSTREL went in pretty quickly. Been listening to The Amazing Blondel (c1970) over the last few days. Highly recommended for excellent musicianship and creative lyrics. Not to mention the odd single entendre.
I couldn’t parse GO ROUND at all so lucky it couldn’t have been anything else really. (I did work it out during the long watches of the night later, but I wasn’t totally convinced.)
I thought 26ac was a bit loose in that respect so I was pleased to come here and find a better explanation (albeit a bit obscure) than my version which required the removal of almost all the letters of “English” (i.e. E,N,G,L and S) from Gleneagles (course in Scotland) leaving us with the correct answer EAGLE. It now seems anyway that Gleneagles is a venue for golf rather than a specific course as there’s more than one and they have their own individual names.
TRIKE for “toy” has come up before and I still fail to understand it, nor can I find it justified in any of the usual sources. I had one as a child and it was a prize possession, a properly designed and engineered vehicle – anything but a toy.
Edited at 2015-08-25 04:48 am (UTC)
The Californian fault was so biffable that I hardly noticed how clever it was.
Edited at 2015-08-25 07:13 am (UTC)
Put In Not Acknowledging The Artistry?
35 minutes for me with BOO BOO LOI. Should have been Boo hoo given the time it took me.
Edited at 2015-08-25 07:41 am (UTC)
San Andreas is the perfect example of a clever clue you’d only parse if you were leading the blog. Well done, Tim!
I thought LANDOWNER and HALF TRUTH added wit and colour to the mix.
Bridge, eh? Any chance of a doping scandal? Then we could admit it as an Olympic sport
A good set of clues, with nothing to complain about. That’s not been the case with some of the Guardian puzzles that I’ve been tackling over the last six weeks. Re one of yesterday’s clues deemed ‘rubbish’ by some, it was the epitome of purity compared to some clues from the pen of one or two Guardian setters.
Unities guessed at, go round twigged post solve, the fault line biffed.
I notice there is an increasing number of references to “biffing” in these comments (no fewer than 15 today), it would seem mostly by those who have failed to solve clues but would like nevertheless to post a fast time or simply to claim to have finished the day’s crossword. It seems somewhat reminiscent of the commuter who simply fills in random letters to impress his fellow travellers with his ability to complete the Times crossword before reaching Waterloo. I believe the term came into being on this site only in January this year – originally, I understand, as an acronym for “bunged in from definition” although in many current examples the “biff” could be reduced to plain “bi”. How did contributors to the site refer to this approach in pre-biffing days? Heuristic analysis, hypothesis, conjecture, guess? I would feel mildly dishonest if I claimed to have “completed” the puzzle without fully understanding all the answers.
“Completing” the puzzle by getting all the right letters in all the right squares is hardly the same as filling in random letters.
And what if I’ve used the wordplay to arrive at a word I think has to be the answer but is something I’ve never heard of? Is that dishonest because I’ve put in a word I don’t know?
Regardless, until the Championships feature a post-solve interrogation to ensure such full understanding I think I’ll probably carry on biffing. Besides, you can’t really mean what you say so you must just be trolling.
Edited at 2015-08-26 07:25 am (UTC)
I’m alarmed by Verlaine’s brisk time, but slightly relieved to be more or less level pegging with Sotira and crypticsue – though the three of us will need to raise our game come October.