23:03 on the club timer. I know there isn’t a timetable for these things, but like yesterday’s, I’d class this one as “unexpectedly tricky for its day”, based on my experience of alternate Tuesday puzzles. However, there was nothing I’d class as unfair (barring one obscure Americanism); for the most part it just required methodical detective work and occasional inspiration to unpick, so I’d give this top marks as a puzzle towards the higher end of the difficulty scale.
Across |
1 |
BISTRO – 1ST in BRO. |
5 |
IZVESTIA “IS” Versus ESTONIA. It struck me that we’d had this not long ago, and indeed a quick Google tells me it last appeared on May 3rd this year; on that occasion it was spelt IZVESTIYA, which, it was pointed out, isn’t the usual spelling, and here is the proof. |
9 |
VEHEMENT – HE, MEN in VETERAN, as in “Vietnam vet”. |
10 |
MALAWI – LAW in MAIN. |
11 |
PULL BACK – Spoonerism of BULL PACK; expressing it as “transfers of capital” creates a top class surface for this clue. |
12 |
TIPPLE – TIP(=pour),PLEASE. Thank you, bartender. |
13 |
NEARSIDE – River inside [NE(=Tyneside),Area,SIDE]. |
15 |
HYPE – hidden in reverse in sleEPYHead. I was a little uncertain here, as I’d always thought the conventional abbreviation for hypodermic was “hypo”, but it’s in the dictionary. Plus it’s one of those rare Times words which is all checkers, so no problems. |
17 |
SHOE – SHORE minus laboureR; to match 15ac, I had doubts about this one, which were dismissed because all the letters are checked; the definition (“maybe casual”) is a bit weak, if you ask me, and the definition of “shore” is somewhat obscure, at least as a noun – this sort of “shore” is the post with which you “shore up” something which is threatening to fall over. Minor quibbling, anyway. |
19 |
PSALMIST – [(LP)rev.,MIST] around SA. |
20 |
MASONS – stONes in MASS(=service) &lit. |
21 |
SHERIDAN – E.R.(=HM the Queen=”leading lady”) in (DANISH)*. Author of The Rivals and The School for Scandal
|
22 |
RED TOP – Reporter,ED.,Time,OPus. Possibly obscure to non-UK solvers: the “red tops” are the down-market tabloids, some of which often have a splash of red in their masthead at the top of the front page. |
23 |
ROOMETTE – MET(=settled) in ROOTED. I spent a while looking for a word ending in NY, but it’s just a generally American word (though pretty easily deduced by non-American solvers) |
24 |
DOPINESS – Daughter OPINES Son. |
25 |
EATERY – dEpArTsEaRlY. |
|
Down |
2 |
INEQUITY – I,[QUIT in (YEN)rev.]; several normally speedy solvers have a single error, I wonder if it’s doing what I nearly did, i.e. seeing “I QUIT” and writing in INIQUITY without thinking any further… |
3 |
TREELINE – cryptic def. |
4 |
OPERA HATS – (HARE)rev. in Old PAT’S, Pat being a non-gender specific name. Though I suppose the hats can be worn by anyone if they really want to, as well. |
5 |
IT TAKES ALL SORTS – (LAST,TALKS,TORIES)*. A nice political surface. |
6 |
EXAMINE – (Idi) AMIN in EXE. Lovely misdirection with the capitals. |
7 |
TRAMPISH – [MP(the military policeman in this case rather than a Parliamentarian),1] in TRASH. |
8 |
ANISETTE – (TISANE)* and TEA(e.g. Lapsang Souchong) without the A. |
14 |
DRIVE HOME – double def. |
15 |
HAMMERED – [ruM, MERE] in HAD(=enjoyed). |
16 |
PASSED UP – PASS(=academic achievement), FED UP. |
17 |
STRIDENT – pronounceS, TRIDENT. |
18 |
ONE-ACTER – [CAEN in (RE:TO)]all rev. |
19 |
PONTOON – PRONTO minus the Rex, ON(=playing). |
I wonder whether ONE ACTER might be another trip up for the leaderboard solvers – it does look wrong even though it’s right, and if it had been an across clue I would probably have written in the O on reflex.
Good, heavyweight cluing. TREELINE gets top marks from me for its simple but very effective deception, would have been last in if I’d got INEQUITY right at first bash.
Wow! Bit of a struggle, but got there eventually, but with ?s all over the place: IZVESTIA (unknown), SHOE (well, it had to be that, but why…?), ONE-ACTER (couldn’t parse) , OPERA HATS (ditto) etc.
Well done, and many thanks to Tim for sorting it all out.
Both the fully-checked words were pretty weak; maybe the setter thought ‘To hell with it, they don’t need a decent clue!’ -:)
Edited at 2013-08-13 08:37 am (UTC)
(Actually this sounds a bit Zen, now I consider it. If a clue doesn’t need to be solved, is it a clue?)
George Clements
I was probably fortunate to have seen TREELINE right away, but I initially wrote in “iniquity” at 2dn without parsing it properly and didn’t correct it until I realised that VEHEMENT had to be the answer for 9ac. I had most trouble in the SW with the MASONS/DOPINESS/HAMMERED crossers my last ones in. This was definitely a puzzle in which one had to pay very close attention to the wordplay.
Edited at 2013-08-13 06:14 pm (UTC)
As for the “in”, I see what you mean, and “for” might have been more elegant, probably only the setter can tell you that, but I think it’s because those sort of connecting words are usually regarded as more or less ignorable and interchangeable. To be honest, I didn’t even consider it, which shows how you stop really noticing them after a while…
I’ve never done a word count but I wonder if this puzzle might break the record for the most wordy clues. I reckon it would take a good 5-10 minutes to read them all properly even without writing any answers in.
Some very neat clues. 19dn and 24 had very elegant and deceptively simple surfaces.
As I needed to go out, leaving puzzle unfinished there’s an extra 3hr on my time. On return didn’t see I’d carelessly got STENDHAL at 21, so couldn’t get anywhere in SE till I had another look, then after getting 17 hastily put in EATERS at 25 without checking against clue. Finally INIQUITY stopped me getting 9 for a while, so actual solving time about 85min., including that going to aids to look for words that might fit my wrong checkers.
Edited at 2013-08-13 01:38 pm (UTC)
Got 1ac at first look but took an age to get many more thereafter until I got Sheridan then It Takes All Sorts.
Izvestia beat me last time so I was pleased to dredge it up when I had I????T?A.
Last in was VEHEMENT, once I finally reconsidered INIQUITY.