Timed at 16:33, and very much enjoyed, though, as usual, I was nearly tripped up by assorted stray plants. I am a hopeless gardener, so this happens to me in both real life and in crosswords.
Across |
1 |
EMPHASIS – [MP HAS 1] in ElectionS. |
9 |
HAIRBALL – BALL at end of HAIR. “Queen” as female cat is always one to look out for. |
10 |
UNFAIR – tUrN oFf + AIR. |
11 |
READERSHIP – (PRAISEDHER)*. |
12 |
MARS – double def., Mars as the god of war can stand in for the thing itself by metonymy. |
13 |
ASSISTANCE – ASS + 1 + STANCE. |
16 |
GELATIN – (E.G.)rev. + LATIN; lovely misdirection which had me thinking setter must suggest “I” or “me” or something similar. |
17 |
CARVERY – CAR + VERY; I’d have said a carvery was a restaurant rather than a cafe, but the definitions for eating establishments aren’t strict enough for this to be a quibble. |
20 |
DIRECTOIRE – (OCTober)* in DIRE IRE. Excellent revolutionary surface. |
22 |
CHAR – CHARt. |
23 |
BONESHAKER – [ONE (HAS)*] in (KERB)*. I only thought of this as referring to early bicycles, but it would seem it can apply to other vehicles? |
25 |
ALICIA – gALICIA. |
26 |
UNICYCLE – ICY in UNCLE; exactly why the pawnbroker became known as Uncle seems to have been lost down the ages. |
27 |
RETINUES – IN inside (i.e. stayed by) RE:(“on”) TUES. Very elegant. |
|
Down |
2 |
MANDRAKE – i.e. MAN (crew) + DRAKE. |
3 |
HEARTSEASE – HE + ART + [A Small in SEE]. |
4 |
SURREALIST – SURREy + ‘A’ LIST. |
5 |
SHIATSU – Surgeon + HIATUS with the U/S (useless) turned upside down. |
6 |
FINE – stufF IN Expensive. |
7 |
FAT HEN – FATHEr + gardeN. I was well beyond my comfort zone with this weed. |
8 |
SLIPPERY – Mules (the animal) are stubborn, of course, but mules (the footwear) are slippers, so this is the adjective for them. Boom boom! (I heard this clue in the voice of Barry Cryer, who often does this sort of thing while offering new definitions for the Uxbridge English Dictonary on I’m Sorry I Haven’t A Clue. “Sticky: a bit like a stick”, that sort of thing.) |
14 |
STAGECRAFT – (FARCE + GATS)rev. + Time. I got the answer long before I worked out how the comedy and the “pieces” fitted together… |
15 |
ADVOCATION – i.e. an ADvert VOCATION. |
16 |
GADABOUT – A (BAD)rev. in GOUT. |
18 |
ROADSIDE – Old AD’S in RIDE. |
19 |
DINKIER – KIn in DINER. |
21 |
RUNCIE – I in RUN C(of)E, &lit. referring to the 102nd Archbishop of Canterbury. |
24 |
HACK – double def. |
A FINE puzzle I thought. (Though I’d forgotten the “posh brandy” meaning of that word.) What else to like?: finding the FARCE and the GATS in 14dn after the fact, as per Tim. Realising that it was GOUT that was needed in 16dn and not “a bout”. All of 16ac. But COD to RUNCIE for this &lit-sucker.
On edit: just found this in Chambers for BONESHAKER: “any uncertainly reliable, crazy vehicle”.
Edited at 2011-07-05 02:23 am (UTC)
Ah, Robert Runcie … Whisper this quietly, but I was confirmed by him when he was Bishop of St Alban’s.
And I lived there for 13 years!
GELATIN gets my COD today.
I would have defined BONESHAKER as an early bicycle, and had I been setting, the proximity of the UNICYCLE would have been irresistible. I guess the reason why it was called a boneshaker makes the word fair game for anything without decent suspension.
CoD’s nominations today: RUNCIE for sheer, stunning &literacy; SLIPPERY for awful punnery; GELATIN for misdirection of the week (“setter for example” – dog? me? complier?); ROADSIDE for the Most Imaginative Use of “Old Bill” award; DIRECTOIRE for not cluing with knickers; MARS for economy. And the winner is…
We have the Beaulieu Car Museum not so far from us so a regular outing for the grandchildren which meant BONESHAKER applied to old cars was no surprise. The clue to RUNCIE is excellent. Only one blip – a CARVERY, whatever else it might be, certainly isn’t a cafe.
Thanks for the blog: I thought FINE was just a cryptic definition, and I missed GATS.
I would hesitate to accept either “café” or “restaurant” as a definition of CARVERY. “Culinary horror” would be closer to the mark.
The reason I like the Times is because it flatters me that I’m an intelligent polymath – completely wrong, of course, probably in both particulars, but it makes me feel good even if I have to look stuff up on occasions, almost always with the TLS or the Club monthly. Then I learn stuff.
A person’s reach must exceed his grasp or what’s a heaven (afterlife, utopia, Elysium, elysian fields, happy hunting-ground, New Jerusalem, promised land, Zion, nirvana, Valhalla, Swarga, Land o’ the Leal, Asgard, Olympus, amend as appropriate) for?
I did like the rest, but was very slow. I put put in and erased ‘stagecraft’ four times, never seeing the wordplay and thinking ‘age’ = time. When I got ‘Runcie’ early on, I knew this would be a high-quality puzzle.
Then let’s assess our roles in this exchange. I wrote a blog in the house style, you made an a) anonymous and b) deliberately inflammatory attack on it. By that token, you fit the definition of a troll pretty snugly. To respond to you as you deserve is not cowardly or bullying; you trolled, I responded appropriately.
I have no idea what you mean by ‘crossword solver’. I’m also not sure in what sort of world it’s considered polite to insult a complete stranger anonymously (P.S. you posted an anonymous complaint about “cowardly types sitting behind the defensive barriers that are your computer screens”, so perhaps you are simply a professional ironist rather than a troll) then pretend to be surprised when they don’t react by engaging in reasoned debate, and act as if it’s peculiar for a person take offence at such behaviour. Finally, if you want to meet face-to-face, I’m happy to oblige, but I don’t imagine you actually want that (please feel free to suggest a time and place if you do).
As for defending the site, I think it speaks for itself. You seem to think it is a bespoke commercial service supplied as some sort of contractual obligation to you, and you alone, so I am sorry to have to break the news that it’s not. If you can spare a few minutes to read the information linked from “About this blog…” at the top of the page, you will find an explanation for the citing of solving times which irks you so (clue: the blog is called “Times for the Times”).
A little further reading would also have demonstrated that this blog is on the whole an amiable place, populated by a wide mix of people who are united in their enjoyment of the Times crossword. At present, only one person is spoiling the atmosphere, and I am obviously breaking all the rules by feeding the troll, so I think it might be better if this correspondence was declared closed.