Solving time: 44 minutes
Parts of this one seemed fairly difficult to me. There are a few clues where the literal is quite subtle – or wildly unfair, if you didn’t see it. I started off well enough, but after about 30 minutes was stuck for quite a while on my last three.
Music: John Field, Noctures/Piano Concerto #2
Across | |
---|---|
1 | FIESTA, FI(E)ST + A. For those who think duke is always ‘D’, a counterexample. |
5 | NIMBYISM, N(I M.B.)Y + IS + M. A fine clue, with a subtle literal, although I have never liked calling a Bachelor of Medicine a ‘doctor’, since that title should be reserved for a Doctor of Medicine. |
9 | ENHANCES, EN + [c]HANCES. Another tough but fair literal. The first part of the cryptic is obvious enough, but some thought is required for the second. |
10 | UNKIND. U[nited]N[ations] + KIND, cryptic not seen until called upon to blog it. |
12 | INTEGRAL, I(N)T + LARGE backwards. Definition is ‘basic’, not immediately obvious. |
14 | FIGURE SKATER, FIGURES + KATE + R. It figures! |
17 | MAGIC LANTERN, CLAN inside anagram of EMIGRANT. Another excellent clue. |
20 | TASHKENT, sounds like ‘TACHE KENT. Does ‘kenned’ really get a contracted weak preterite in Scottish dialect? |
22 | TESTON, NOT SET backwards. One of the toughies for me. For a long time I wanted to put in ‘pistol’ as a variant spelling of ‘pistole’, but it turns out to be a variant spelling of ‘testoon’. |
23 | MISFIT. MI + S(F[ulfilled]I[t])T. Cute. |
25 | PREVIOUS, P(REV)IOUS. The literal is a little shaky, shouldn’t it be ‘earlier conviction’, as in “doesn’t he have a previous?”. |
26 | BLIZZARD, B + sounds like LIZARD. I was tempted to put in ‘Penzance’ when I had only the ‘z’, but could not make it fit the clue. |
27 | TAHITI, T[h](A HIT)I[s]. I made really heavy going of this, but the literal is well-hidden. My difficulty was in seeing what to take the odd parts of. The Hamlet allusion should be well-known. |
Down | |
3 | STANDOFFISH, STAND OF FISH. A clever and compact clue. I vaguely remember having seen something like this before, but it took me a long time to solve it. |
4 | ARCHANGEL, [e]AR(CHANGE)L[y]. Many possible meanings to the cryptic, but not too many Russian ports that fit. |
5 | NASTIER, SAN backwards + TIER. |
8 | SUN-BAKED, anagram of DUNES around BA[n]K. The clue could just as well indicate a word meaning ‘ridge’ that is an anagram of ARID DU[n}ES, but there is no such word. |
13 | GRANNY SMITH, double cryptic definition. I had supposed that ‘forger’ referred to a specific individual, but it turns out to mean a metalworker at a forge. |
15 | SWEETMEAT, sounds like SUITE + MEET. The literal verges on unfair, since a ‘sucker’ implies some sort of hard candy, not what I would call a sweetmeat, which is more likely to be a candied fruit that is chewed and not sucked. Anyway, this was my last in. |
16 | MALARIAL, MAL(ARIA)L. Again, ‘mall’ defined by ‘precinct’ is a bit of a stretch to me. |
18 | NOTEPAD, N(O[ld]T[estament])E + PAD. Tyneside is, of course, in the Northeast. |
21 | EXTRA, EXTRA[ct]. A witty subtraction clue. |
24 | FEZ, FE(-W+Z). Perhaps a little weak, I never really liked the type of clue where there is no particular reason to substitute one letter for another. |
Yep, that seems to be OK. Mac OED has:
verb (kenning |ˈkɛnɪŋ|; past and past part. kenned |kɛnd| or kent |kent| |kɛnt|) [trans.] Scottish & N. English.
In several dictionaries, “teston” seems to be the routine form and “testoon” the variant. I didn’t know it either. Seems to be about a shilling.
I found this one quite easy (13 mins). More cruciverbal synchronicity: horrible mosquito-borne diseases were being discussed on the radio as I pondered 16dn. And COD to NIMBYISM.
I finished up, not very enthusiastically, with TESTON. I was worried about the repetition of ‘not’ and the word didn’t have a historic ring somehow. Couldn’t even find it in my dictionary, but it turned up on a Google search.
I would have agreed with Vinyl’s comment about SWEETMEAT especially as these can include such things as pastries and cakes which one doesn’t usually suck unless one is toothless, but both COED and Chambers give very broad definitions which probably cover it.
Never heard of TESTON before.
COD a dead heat bewteen Nimbyism and previous
well done setter!
Either I am missing something or 10ac is not a very good clue. Is “UN kind” being used in the sense of mankind? A bit laboured if so, seems to me.
I get the impression that use of solving aids by some posters here is becoming steadily more common. I don’t have any objection of course – each to their own – but I do have a theory that if you stick at it and keep trying to solve clues without aids, eventually you will not need them at all.. but on the other hand, regular use will build a crutch that cannot easily be discarded. Just my 2p..
Surely nothing other than STANDOFFISH for COD if only for the perfect acronym.
For those with no turntable the Naxos John Field recordings of the solo works and concertos are splendid and cheap, but rather more than 50 cents.
I can see that the setter found STAND-OF-FISH irresistible but if you know that Billingsgate was the old fish market it’s rather easy as is the Russian port. On the other hand “sucker” for SWEETMEAT is a bit of a stretch and “kent” for known is obscure as is TESTON.
I liked NIMBYISM, a trait I fully support.
Have visited Lizard Point in Cornwall. It’s a rugged spot and the lighthouse there has a very loud foghorn.
COD to NIMBYISM, a terrific clue.
Got off to a good start then had a long pause from 10 to 20 minutes when I had a wonderful 5 minutes where everything else bar one fell into place. Finally a few minutes for TESTON as I worked through the alphabet.
I thought NIMBYISM was excellent with TASHKENT and STANDOFFISH not far behind.
I agree that my concept of a sweetmeat is not something that is sucked.
Barry J
Nick M
I think 5a may be somewhat UK-centric in that in Britain MB, along with ChB or BS, are the standard qualifications for a doctor of medicine.
Nick M
The thrill of solving without aids is something that I have only really appreciated since using this site. Probably The Times crossword is most amenable to this approach because of its consistent standard and good editing. I respect the view that an hour is long enough to waste on any crossword. However, a puzzle that seems impossible at breakfast may suddenly become easy when one returns to it after lunch. Sometimes I do a crossword last thing at night in bed. I have lost count of the number of times that I have given up on an impossible clue only to find that the answer suddenly comes to me as I am putting the cats out.
Edited at 2010-02-22 09:48 pm (UTC)