Times 24248 – Grand slammers in the slammer?

Solving time: 18:40

Very slow, but better than yesterday! There was no huge delay for the last two answers (2 and 11), so I’m fairly sure this will simply be tough for everyone. Barring a tad of general knowledge at 13, all the difficulty is in the wordplay and some very good bits of disguise, and it was tricky to find a clue to leave out of this report, which is probably the slowest to type up for ages (even with all the wordplays already noted on paper). 28, 4, 6, 11 went in without full understanding of the clue. There are at least three clues with prison-related surface meanings, and a couple that relate or could relate to tennis tournaments.

Across
1 A BAND(ON)’S HIP – I wonder if some will grumble about a tricky def. here – I’m letting it pass as I solved the clue and didn’t think anything was awry when doing so.
7 ClInG- CIG=cigarette=”smoke” (n.) – two Brit. informal usages, of which ‘cig’ is rather surprisingly not in COED.
9 SKIN-TIGHT – (thinks it,G=good)* – “pressing the flesh” is a very good deceptive def.
10 A,R,TIE – “rug in the van” = R which is in the front=van of “rug”. And “guy rope” needs separating to find the def.
11 BELT OUT = “to do a lusty performance of” – Ring=BELT, unacceptable=OUT. Contrary to the surface, a bit of lust in Wagner’s Ring is almost compulsory today – the chance of Siegmund not ending up on top of Sieglinde at the end of Valkyrie Act 1 is almost nil and naked Rhinemaidens are three a pfennig (sorry). This (see c. 5:00) is about as subtle as it gets.
12 P,REST ON = “prolong holiday”, with “east of” indicating the charade order. Preston, one of our youngest “cities” in terms of official city status, is not very far from 28A. Or rather, 40-odd miles up the M61 means nothing to southerners like me.
13 REMUS – 2 defs. – “US relative who did accounts” is Uncle Remus, and “Partner in City foundation” is the twin of Romulus. First def slightly cheeky for just REMUS, but the word “relative” makes things clear.
15 LIQUOR,ICE (vb.) = “finish off cake”.
17 KIN=family,G.(Co.)B.,R=(electrical) resistance,A
19 S(W)EEP – this uses “A stopped by B” to indicate B in A – the more acceptable choice for me – stop=”block or close up”. Corrected after seeing Mark T’s comment
20 UP TEMPO = (poem put)*. “quickly in play” is another tricky def., with the solver having to establish that it’s the musical kind of “play”.
22 INTEGER – reverse hidden in “Yorkshire get nicked”. Prison-related surface, like 19.
24 KURDS = UK rev., RD’S = “street’s”. Cheeky indication of the abbreviation but road and street are synonyms.
25 TRICOLOUR = “trickler”, as long as you say it fairly quickly. Brief delay here as “oriflamme” happens to have 9 letters too, and came to mind first.
28 OLD=veteran,TR=”right back”,A,F=fine,FORD = cross (a river). The elusive def. “where” is excused by this being a semi &lit – the whole clue is the real def. (Old Trafford being where Manchester United play).
 
Down
1 (b)ASS – “one easily had” is another very clever def.
2 AXIAL – A=article,I in rev. of LAX=loose
3 DOT COMS = concerns = as in “going concern”. CT in (S=singular,MOOD) rev.
4 NIGH=to hand,TCLU=”new cult”,B=book.
5 H=horse,O,TUP=ram
6 PLACE=spot,BO = rev. of OB=old boy=”pupil once”.
7 CUT IT=succeed,FINE=perfectly well (COED has a suitable adverb definition)
8 GREEN=raw,KEEPER=”conservative chap”. “tender of course” is the def. Strange frisson from writing GREEN when the Greens are not Conservatives and the trad Conservative colour is blue.
11 B(A, RE=touching,KN.=knots)UCKLE)
14 MO(NIT)ORED – Collins has the required noun meaning of “stupid” to match nit. “cuts” is an insertion indicator, and “connected to bank” describes a moored boat.
16 QUA=as,LIF(I)ER – heat is the def., and we’re back in clink in the surface reading.
18 COMES TO – 2 defs, one being hits as in “he will hit town tomorrow night” – the Collins sample phrase.
19 SETS OFF = triggers. A successful underdog at Winbledon might be said to pull (off) a set against “pull [one or more] sets off” a seed.
21 “OCT. AD” = “Autumn promotion”. There are 8 quarter-finalists now that we’re in sports tournaments rather than jail.
23 GOO=treacle=cloying sentimentality,DO=cook. Good-O is a dated British (and Australian in Collins) exclamation of approval
26 R,OD=overdose=”take too much”.

57 comments on “Times 24248 – Grand slammers in the slammer?”

  1. Time taken: the same time as it took the booster on the solar system to heat enough water for a shower.
    Had loads of trouble with 24, probably because “used for” isn’t a link (I think) I’ve seen before. I tinkered with “karts” for a while. And maybe because of the dubious homophone, fell for “tricolore” at 25. (Trickler today, tickler yesterday?) If I have a COD, it’s 6 (PLACEBO) for the sheer amount of work that must have gone into making the surface work. Hats off!
  2. Around an hour for this. Most of the RH went in quite quickly, the exceptions being ARTIE at 10ac and PLACEBO at 6dn, but I became bogged down on the LH, at one stage entering only 3 answers in 18 minutes. Then in a sudden burst of activity I polished off the gaps in the SW before grinding to a halt again and I had to pick off the NW very slowly one by one, 3dn and 2dn being the last to go in.

    I was going to query “nit” = “stupid” but Peter confirms that Collins (to which I have no access at the moment) says it’s okay. However I don’t see how “desert” can possibly = “abandon ship” and I think the wordplay in 19d is just plain daft. I saw the possible answer straight away with no checking letters in place but would never have worked out the reasoning despite being a huge tennis fan.

    That said, some of this puzzle was very clever indeed and certainly couldn’t be described as boring.

  3. As Jack says, I thought this was a bit of a curate’s egg. Some very nice stuff but some clues which I really didn’t like much.
    The latter include: 24ac (I don’t think Kurds are a “race”); 10ac – has anyone ever met a man called ARTIE?; 1ac and 19ac for the reasons Jack says, and 25ac where the homophone doesn’t work for me (although Chambers gives a pronunciation which seems to work, although “trickler” doesn’t exist in Chambers or COED (I expect to be told it is in Collins! – or perhaps it doesn’t need actually to exist anyway).
    Lots of clever cryptic definitions though – I liked 9ac, 8dn and 28 ac.

    1. > has anyone ever met a man called ARTIE
      Well Simon and Garfunkel are touring Oz shortly.
      1. I’ve not heard Art Garfunkel called Artie. Anyway, neither Art nor Artie appear in Chambers’ list of given names. (I’ve lent my Oxford Dictionary of Christian Names to my nephew, so I can’t check that!)
          1. I remember reading an interview with Paul Simon, in which his partner was always ‘Artie’.

            Tom B.

  4. The “veteran right back” playing at Old Trafford must be Manchester United’s 34-year old Gary Neville, who is expected to be recalled after a long absence for England’s match against Andorra tonight.
  5. Just under the hour for me too. Undone by the LIQUORICE/QUALIFIER crossing with PRESTON/PLACEBO. How clever is “finish off cake”? And “‘s to hand” for “nigh”? Not to mention “one easily had” which I couldn’t see for ages even though I knew it had to be ASS. I’m quite prepared to forgive TRICOLOUR and SETS OFF, and didn’t see any problem with desert=abandon ship at the time, or now. I saw it as a metaphoric reading rather than a literal. I thought ASS, ROD and particularly END were superb three letter clues, but COD to OLD TRAFFORD. Another chapeaux! from me.
  6. 14:39, with three mistakes.  I knew BALL OUT (11ac) was wrong as soon as I wrote it in, and flagged it for revision, but forgot about it.  I didn’t realize TRICOLORE (25ac) was wrong (is it?).  And my grid was in such a mess after writing in WAR MEMORIAL at 28ac and having to replace it with OLD TRAFFORD that I didn’t notice I hadn’t solved 26dn (ROD), which would have been easy if I hadn’t had the letters down as E?D.  And I thought my downfall would be the guess at ARTIE at 10ac!  Absurdly, I only know of Uncle REMUS (13ac) through Frank Zappa.

    I’m sure any serviceman who has had to ABANDON SHIP will resent the definition in 1ac, but I think there’s a colloquial usage that fits the intransitive sense of “desert” (though I don’t have access to dictionaries here).  Now that I’ve been told how 19dn (SETS OFF) works, I don’t like it.

    A small correction to Peter’s blog for 19ac: it’s “A stopped by B”.  (For a moment there I thought we disagreed on the acceptable direction of stopping!)

    Clue of the Day: 9ac (SKIN-TIGHT).

    1. I had Uncle Remus as a kid, and also gave it to my kids. The Tar Baby is my favourite – “Born and raised in a briar patch, Brer Fox!”

      I don’t know that Frank Zappa album – the only one I have is almost entirely instrumental, except for a brief burst of Captain Beefheart.

    2. At 25 I think both TRICOLORE and TRICOLEUR would count as very tempting answers. From memory, I thought of the second of the two as well as TRICOLOUR, and waited for 23D to decide.
  7. About 20 mins. A very interesting and enjoyable crossword, despite the naughty bits (indirect indications of abbreviations GB, UK, RD) with a distinct sporting feel (football, cricket, tennis, golf, boxing). The &lit. for Gary Neville at 28A is brilliant; didn’t he have a column in the Times for a while?

    Tom B.

  8. ” … it was tricky to find a clue to leave out of this report.”

    Why do people writing the solutions to Times crosswords invariably leave some solutions out? Or fail to explain what they assume is obvious? Yesterday the solutions to 2 and 12 down were omitted. Why?

    Surely the purpose of this site is to give people who haven’t solved a crossword the answers and explain how they are derived … not to brag about finishing on the tube “between Marble Arch and Tottenham Court Road” in some time so short it wasn’t worth doing. I’m sure it takes some of you longer to write in and tell the world how wonderful you are than it does to complete the crossword. Why bother if you’ve done it?

    Let’s have complete and comprehensive blogs, not bragging.

    1. The answer to all your questions and more are given in the link “About this blog…” at the top of the page.
      1. Oh, and I should add, apropos of Anax’s comments below, that the contributors here are always more than happy to answer any query that you may have regarding the day’s crossword, if you feel something has not been adequately explained in the blog.
    2. OMISSIONS: Please see “About This Blog” (top of page).
      TIMES: The blog is called “Times for The Times” which, to a degree, suggests why many contributors say how long it took to complete a puzzle.

      Not everyone posts their times, but those who do give a helpful indication of the overall difficulty level of a puzzle. I’ve had the great pleasure of meeting many of this blog’s contributors and I can assure you that bragging just ain’t in their natures.

    3. Times and comments are posted here by people from beginners to experts – and there are some who are making that very transition thanks to this site.  Posting impressive times might look like bragging at first, but it soon becomes apparent that those who mention a time do so pretty much every day, whether or not it’s impressive.  I can’t speak for anyone else, but my two main reasons for posting times are:

      1.  I have neglected daily puzzles for several years, and would like to get better at them.  Posting my times (whatever they are) makes a daily timed puzzle feel more like a commitment.  I have a competitive interest in this because, like several others here, I will be taking part in the Times crossword championship in October.  (That’s not a brag either – I try to encourage others to do the same, because it’s a good opportunity to meet other solvers.)

      2.  I find it interesting to see how hard others found a given puzzle, as indicated by the time they took compared to what I know to be their typical times.  It would be selfish not to provide similar information myself if I had it to hand.  That’s not to say that I think everyone should post times – quite the reverse, in fact, because I don’t think everyone should time themselves.  There was some discussion about this a couple of weeks ago here (just over halfway down).

      1. Very occasionally bloggers mention all or part of a clue’s wording. I think it would be good if this happened more often, perhaps for very involved clues (or, for that matter, those which the contributor feels are noteworthy).

        Setting crosswords is keeping me so busy at the moment my opportunities to solve the daily puzzle are increasingly rare, but I love this place and it would be great to be able to chip in and help with clues which are causing confusion.

    4. Quite right, Anon. I get very irritated by all the people on this site telling the world how wonderful they are. They’re taking attention away from ME.

      Personally, I’m convinced that the purpose of this site is to have rambling, tangential and surprising conversations about anything and nothing, sometimes even vaguely relevant to the day’s crossword. But this Biddlecombe chap keeps trying to make it a bit more structured than that (I have no idea who he is – he just turned up one day and we can’t seem to get rid of him).

    5. The reason given for purposely omitting two or three
      answers in the blog is that it gives the Times the opportunity to make a bit more money from callers who phone in for answers. That seems like a silly reason, considering that the blogs cover more than 90% of the answers. Is that an agreement with the Times, or is it merely the decision of the originator of this website?
      In addition, I believe the majority of this site’s readers have little or no interest in other people’s solving times. That would be of interest only to the handful of people who regularly enter puzzle contests, where speed is an important factor.
      1. For heavens’ sakes, if you just want the answers, get them from the Times Crossword Club website or from the newspaper the next day and then work out how they were arrived at. That’s how most people improve at crosswords, not by being spoon-fed all the explanations.

        Leaving some of the clues unblogged requires us all to think a little more. It’s analagous with what teachers sometimes call the “learning zone” where you present material just beyond the comfort level.

        As a number of people have already pointed out, if you want a particular clue explained, just ask, if that’s not too much trouble.

        This blog is provided by enthusiastic volunteers who give up a lot of time to make it available to you. If you want it to be something other than what it is, by all means raise the issue (though how you presume to know what the “majority of this site’s readers” want I can’t imagine – I think you mean “what I want”, in which case, say so). Otherwise, feel free to start another blog.

      2. Oh no! This isn’t the Colonel again is it? Take no notice Peter et el – you do a sterling job. I find this blog immensely helpful and entertaining. Talking of which – have I missed the report on the Sloggers and Betters get-together?

        Carole H., Fermo, Italy

        1. Sloggers and Betters: I haven’t written a report yet – I must check with Uncle Yap whether he minds me putting up a link to some photos he took and put on a pic-sharing site. In short, it was the same as ever – a chance for us to meet up with people never met in the flesh or only seen occasionally, and have a good old chinwag. Amazingly, the assembled company in the pub managed to hold out for about two hours before anyone got out any crosswords to solve – they were actually talking! And a victory for the Edgar Wallace – the best pub of all five.
      3. The phone answer service issue is one reason for missing out some clues, but not the only one. Another is that the blogs take time to write – about an hour on top of solving time for today’s, in which quick explanations like “19 S(W)EEP” didn’t seem appropriate. I’d rather have what the blogger can do as soon as possible – which is usually before 12 noon UK time, and often before 9, with comments and responses to fill any important gaps. The decision is mine – other than the crossword editor and setters, and any staff who’ve created or spotted the very occasional mentions of the blog in the paper, I have no idea who at the Times knows about us, or what effect we’ve had on their “answerphone” service takings. My policy may seem silly to you, and it may be unnecessary, but in a situation where the right answer can’t be determined for certain, someone has to make a choice. So until I’m sure this choice can safely be changed, it stays the same. Sotira is quite right to say that if we tell you everything, you may not learn anything, but I can’t honestly claim that’s why we do it this way.

        Everything else is explained in places mentioned in the new “Information for new readers” posting I set up today (in an attempt to reduce repeated discussion of the same old stuff). If you don’t care about the times, just ignore the bits like “About 20 mins.” – they’re a pretty small part of most posts and comments.

  9. Well, what a very strange puzzle. 40 minutes to solve. Congratulations Peter on an excellent blog that must have been quite difficult to put together.

    There don’t seem to be any run of the mill clues here. They’re either absolutely brilliant or terrible with nothing in-between. I loved it all except the stinkers that have already been identified: desert=abandon ship, I don’t think so; the Kurds are an ethnic group within a race; the homophone doesn’t work for me because I pronounce the word as the French do; and SETS OFF is crass. One personal doubt to add to the list: the use of “escaping” in 22A INTEGER?

    OLD TRAFFORD is exceptional but probably very difficult for overseas solvers because of obscurity.

    1. “Escaping” in 22ac conjured up for me an image like Michangelo’s half-finished captives emerging from their blocks of stone. Fanciful perhaps but you get the idea….
  10. A difficult one I think (I hope) for newish solvers.
    All other than ARTIE entered with one error BALL OUT for BELT OUT.
    Not much pleasure as I had question marks against no less than 8 of the answers.
    Humbled by this so no bragging today.
    Thanks Peter as ever for enlightenment. I expect there are a few out there glad this was not their turn.
  11. 22:31 .. followed by about as long again working out how I got the answers!

    Difficulty increased by initially writing in ‘tricoleur’ without thinking it through. I guess there are a few dubious clues, but they’re outweighed for me by some very clever stuff – END and OLD TRAFFORD are both gems.

    Since it was the last one I understood, I’ll blog my COD (Clue Of the Day), 27a, as my good deed for the day:

    27a END – last letters of “the moon elated”, indicated by “finally”. Definition – “Be over”.

  12. Didn’t like the trickler homophone, and after like PB a flirtation with oriflamme tried the -or ending the French use first so of course it did not fit and delayed me a bit. 45 mins. Memo to self, read clues more systematically looking for starters rather than hoping an initial letter will give a quick solve and jumping about..
  13. Exceeding grumpiness from this quarter. Didn’t record a time because of multiple interruptions and (blush) not completed. Had put in BANG OUT for 11 ac, so never got 2 dn. 10 ac ARTIE the worst clue of the year for me. Vaguely aware of an Artie Shaw (musician?), otherwise never heard the name used. Was aware of OLD TRAFFORD as a cricket ground, but did not realise there was a round ball connection. An ABANDON SHIP is to my mind an ordered and orderly procedure, just about the opposite of desertion. Some – OK, many – of the rest are rather good, bordering on very good, but I am not going to let that fact ruin a good grouch.
    1. “Was aware of OLD TRAFFORD as a cricket ground, but did not realise there was a round ball connection”

      This is excellent news for me, ross, as I thought I might be alone in this!

      Given the checking letters the answer was obvious to me so I didn’t bother to explore the niceties of the clue. Old Trafford? Hampden Park? My ignorance of the beautiful game knows no bounds.

  14. Much the same experience an feelings as others. Tough, lots of clever clues plus some awful ones (the homophone for 25 especially). I had so many interruptions that I don’t know how long it took exactly, but certainly over an hour. And to top it all I couldn’t think of anything fitting the definition in 2, even though I understood the clue structure, because, as above, I had BANG OUT for 11. I know I should have reconsidered 11, but by then I’d spent too much time and had lost interest. Lots of question marks en route, such as how an adjective, ‘stupid’ could equal ‘nit’ (now explained by Peter).
  15. Just to add a response from someone who has been doing cryptics for about 2 months and regularly participating in this blog for about 6 weeks. I wonder where else a complete newcomer to any activity could rub shoulders with people so skilled in that activity, and to be made to feel welcome and to receive such authoritative assistance so generously and humourously given. As I said to Mr Biddlecombe recently I feel like a pub team footballer being invited to have a kickabout by Diego Maradona.
    1. Thanks for that barry and I hope our unpleasant anonymous contributor above has read your comment.
  16. 23:33 here, very slow start with only one answer in after 10 minutes (5D). Finally got another start in the bottom half and gradually worked my way up again. Glad to find everyone else found it tough – for a while there I thought my brain had gone missing!
  17. Since i normally only get a chance to browse on here in the late afternoon, most of the key points have already been done and there is nothing more to add, however I cannot let this one go.

    In 28A my train of thought was as follows….With O and D it was clearly OLD and the surface suggested TRAFFORD at which point it was “clear” to me that the veteran was “OLD FART” with the right hand part backwards and this touched (met) FORD meaning a “fine place to cross” as opposed to the swollen banks elsewhere.

    The question I was going to ask the more experienced solvers (before the more sensible version was blogged) was at what level of potential crudeness do the setters stop at. I have several times seen the word TOSSPOT as a solution and thought it a bit risque, but wondered if there were any other anecdotes to be had on this subject.

    For the rather ungrateful anonymous above, mine was a rather ploddy and bitty 45 minutes….

    1. You were not alone in seeing the FART in 28A. Without chasing down the etymology, my guess is that “tosspot” has no more to do with “toss off” than the use of “toss”, though I’m sure we all sniggered at its Shakespearean use in our schooldays.

      Risque stuff does get used, and is sometimes rather stronger than setters would have dared to try 20-odd years ago. But even then, the odd bit of smut crept in by way of the “filth in your mind” technique used by Max Miller and his successors. Much sniggering at a Times Championship final some time around 1980 from this Brian Greer gem: In which three couples get together for sex (5).

      If you like your puzzles blue, you should head straight for Private Eye’s prize crossword.

      1. I think it’s also fair to say that the bar crosswords are a tad earthier than the daily cryptics. This may be because the setters don’t submit through an editor but indulge in “publish and be damned”
  18. 4 hours, 14 minutes. Couldn’t get it finished before time to go to work, but a few hours of mind-numbing day job got me fired up to finish it on a coffee break. There were some real testers here, my last in was ARTIE (I don’t know any Arties, but there is a rather bizarre comedian Artie Lange who is popular on radio).

    A few leaps of faith… wasn’t sure on REMUS, TRICOLOUR came with a grimace, OLD TRAFFORD from part wordplay and figuring it had to be a sporting venue from the surface, NIGHTCLUB without seeing full wordplay.

  19. as a relative newbie i would also like to thank those who give up their time to share both their knowledge and enthusiasm with others on this site. as someone who has done cryptics regularly but not necessarily frequently for nearly 40 years, i have been inspired by this blog to do the times xword everyday and to understand how the answers are arrived at. the fact is that i am making pogress, albeit slower than i would like. my only gripe is not having found it earlier. so thank you.
  20. I will braggingly admit that this took me only 45-50 minutes, and I join the group who went with BALL OUT even though it didn’t feel right. I was held up longest in the SW, where I was convinced 24 across must be KUSTS, and that there must be some race meet with that name over in the UK. (When there’s a lot of UK slang used, anything’s possible!) Only when I changed the STS to RDS could I finish 14D. On the quibbles, I’m not enough of a tennis fan to know if SETS OFF is really that bad, I thought the homophone was telegraphed as a groaner as did Vinyl, ARTIE immediately recalled Artie Shaw the bandleader, and ABANDON SHIP is used in the US in the ‘desert’ sense, commonly. I enjoyed this one, very much, and if 28 was actually identifying a certain individual athlete (cricketer? footballer?) who is being lifted from semi-retirement to play in that venue, it is stunningly brilliant. Since I don’t know if that is actually true, my COD: QUALIFIER. Regards to all.
    1. the more you consider it the better it becomes, since not only is he a footballer of note, he is also (almost exclusively) a right back (which, including variations, is one of possibly twenty plus different positions) who is about to become englands most capped right back this evening. Furthermore there is no hint of confusion regarding the link to Old Trafford since he has only ever played for the one club for circa 20 years, and it is not just a happy coincidence that he once walked out there. The only flaw (on two counts considering the tube strike today) is that the international is being played at Wembley and not OT.

      I have never before profferred a COD, but this has to be it today.

      1. Totally agreed, this clue has made my day. Gary Neville’s father is the splendidly named Neville Neville, in tribute to whom the fans at Old Trafford used to chant an adaptation of Bowie’s ‘Rebel, Rebel’…

        Tom B.

        1. If Mr. Neville fits all those descriptions, congratulations to him, assuming, of course, that ‘most capped’ is a good thing to be as a footballer. To the Setter: outstanding!
    2. Kevin, I agree on the homophone (TRICOLOUR). The setter included ‘perhaps’ and ‘to some ears’, and even then added a question-mark, so I think he/she played fair. I think my rendition of ‘tricolour’ sounds like ‘trickler’ in any case.

      Tom B.

  21. Don’t follow footie, but knew Old Trafford by repute (countless boringly repeated news flashes) . Ashamed to say I was in the OLD (FART)<= brigade.
    No problem with BELT OUT, but ARTIE eluded me.
    Impressed to learn that some of us can distinguish a race from an ethnic group.
    The quaint “trickler” pronunciation is quite prevalent on the Beeb (more often referring to the Irish flag).
    All in all, I thought there were some very clever & deceptive clues here.
    GOD (groan of the day) has to be GOOD-O!

  22. I wonder if anyone else has found they are slower as a result of studying the brilliant analyses of the bloggers? I now pause after each solved answer and either work out the wordplay and sit entranced (or not…) or worry that I haven’t seen it. So times are not what they were…..
  23. I’d like to claim that Gary Neville was in my thoughts in the clue to OLD TRAFFORD, but alas not! As an Arsenal fan it was traumatic contemplating the stadium never mind any of the players.
    Slightly surprised at the reaction to the def in 1 ac, also at the bafflement about ARTIE but maybe because that was my dad’s name and commonly used as a term of affection by my mum!
    I was well aware that TRICKLER/TRICOLOUR was a dodgy homophone, but I’m always slightly baffled that our sense of fun seems to desert us when it comes to homophones 🙂
    All comments are fascinating and most welcome, and I must especially pick out that by mctext: the clue to PLACEBO did indeed take flippin’ ages to polish off!!
    1. Thanks for dropping in. With you on Artie and homophones in general. I understand the grumbles about desert vs. “abandon ship”, but in my pragmatic way, I wasn’t particularly bothered.
  24. Really enjoyed this one. (How ‘Old Trafford’ can be considered obscure is beyond me.)

Comments are closed.