Solving time: 11:13
Fairly fast before I came to a screeching halt on 14D (PERSEPHONE).
As a young boy I read far too many Biggles books, so enjoyed 19Ac. His being such a bad writer had advantages – I remember (aged about 9) surprising my parents when doing a Telegraph puzzle together by knowing the word “opine” – all thanks to Captain W.E. Johns. On the other hand, sei whales and Princess Ida are really only known to me because of crosswords.
Across
1 | POLO NEC K – LOP(rev) ON initial letters of Expensive Clothes and the start of Knit – For some reason I started with CREW NECK here, but fortunately I had doubts and fixed it quickly after getting 1D |
5 | A BATES – I did think of PSYCHO as an answer first time through. |
9 | REGISTER – two meanings, if only just |
10 | TROPPO – (OP(us)+PORT)(all rev) |
12 | WOO + (officia)L + GATHERING |
15 | N.(1 F.T.)Y. |
16 | RATION + ALE |
17 | LAND + SLIPS – that is “light” in the sense of “alight” |
19 | JOHNS(ON) – difficult to think of two more dissimilar writers than Samuel and W.E. |
20 | SHOULD ERST RAP – I do like the clash of registers – is there anywhere other than a crossword where “erst” and “rap” would appear in the same utterance? |
22 | PHENOL – (NO HELP)* |
23 | JO + AN MIRO – ie one of the Little Women followed by (A MINOR)*. I will confess that if the wordplay had not given the spelling I would probably have got it wrong with JUAN |
25 | MOD + IF + (finer)Y – seems rather long-winded, but perhaps it is aiming at a semi-&lit flavour? |
26 | SEI WHALE – (WHILE SEA)* – as a regulator IRL, I am not sure that I like the use of “regulate” as an anagram indicator. |
Down
3 | NOSE + GAY – NOSE being (=”knows”) |
4 | CHE(S(ea)T)ER + FIELD – waited for crossing letters, then entered from definition. Wordplay worked out afterwards |
6 | BURR + I + TO – with a gratuitous “finish” at the end |
7 | TOPOGRAPHER – (A PROPER GOTH)* – it was only noticing the T in GOTH that stopped me from starting to write in GEOGRAPHER, regardless of word-length |
11 | TESTOSTER + ONE, the first element being (STREETS TO)* – “male driver” is a great definition |
13 | OFF ONE’S HEAD – ho-ho. I guessed it was ONE’S rather than YOUR and got away with it |
14 | PER SE + PHONE – took me a couple of minutes after the rest was finished. It was so obviously PHONE at the end, and so obviously could not be a type of telephone |
19 | JUST NOW – did not know about Aristides the Just, but the rest was obvious enough |
21 | SPAM – MAPS(rev) |
24 | IDA(ho) |
At the risk of being boring why can’t the editor get a sensible mix of difficulty instead of these runs of similar puzzles. Previous incumbents managed to grade puzzles Monday through Friday with difficulty increasing as the week progressed. I’m not advocating that but we currently appear to have management by abdication, with even the “no living person” rule broken last Saturday.
I can recommend the latest Anax Imperator which can be found on his website – an excellent puzzle.
I reckon I’ve done really well if I finish in under 30 minutes and okay up to 40. Anything over that is hard in my book. Today I took 45 minutes with several unexplained clues and two errors so it was quite difficult enough for me.
I found it a somewhat traumatic experience as there were too many words and references I just didn’t know so I had to rely on guesswork. And I’m afraid, in desperation, I fouled up at the 1s having plumped for RAREWINKLE at 1d and ROLLNECK at 1a. Don’t ask me what a rarewinkle is but at least it would fit the wordplay if it existed. I suppose “blue” here refers to the sea where apparently the periwinkle lives.
Going for a lie-down now.
Anyway back to normal today. This was quite straightforward, but fun in places.
13dn. At the risk of repeating a discussion of a few weeks ago on the question of “one’s” or “your”, I have come to the conclusion that it is always “one’s” where either is possible. The only time it is “your” is when the definition demands it, particularly when the answer has to be an imperative phrase.
As far as I know, a Monday to Saturday progression of difficulty has never been a stated intention in the Times puzzle, and as you might imagine I’ve paid close attention to any public statements from crossword editors over the years (effectively starting with John Grant, xwd ed 1983-1995, who was in charge when my xwd obsession got really serious). The only relevant ones I can recall were some former xwd editors saying that Monday was intended to be easy (current editor Richard Browne does not claim to do this), and a fairly general implication that Saturday’s puzzle was chosen as a good one, which might imply originality and above-average difficulty.
A challenge for Jimbo: print off three consecutive Mon-Sat weeks for 2000 or 2001, when Mike Laws was in charge. Get Mrs Jimbo to cut off the numbers and shuffle into random order, and then time the lot. My guess is that a “Mon < Tue < Wed < Thu < Fri < Sat” sequence of timings will not happen for any of the weeks.
I don’t think we’re anywhere near “management by abdication”, given the steps we know are taken to avoid repetition of answers. I think that’s more useful than getting hung up on difficulty, which as every day’s set of comments shows, depends so much on the solver.
Jimbo seems to have much more retained crossword knowledge than most solvers, so perhaps there were a lot of unoriginal treatments here that we of the goldfish tendency thought we were seeing for the first time.
No real champagne moments, but a balanced and challenging whole.
The Polo-Neck Persephones were an all-girl a capella group of Harvard grad students best remembered, if at all, for calling Jay Leno a “grubby oik” on the Tonight Show.
I definitely did not like what Richard calls ‘a gratuitous “finish”‘ at the end of 6. Does it make any sense in the cryptic reading? I quite liked the use of “screened” in 5.
I know passe should have an acute accent, but the preview box puts a a couple of question marks against it, so I’ve omitted it.
Tom B.
As a bit of a philistine, JOAN MIRO was new to me and I had to dredge my memory banks for PERSEPHONE, although once I twigged what ‘mobile’ meant, it got a bit easier.
My favourite clue today was 11d
Sei whale was a guess and I’d never heard of whatshisface the just.
Q-0, E-5, D-7, COD shoulderstrap, 1 across rock: Chesterfield “polo neck” Periwinkle, Boston’s answer to Perry Como, and more famous for his bad taste in jumpers than his singing voice.
But PERIWINKLE and LANDSLIPS they would not come. Land SLIDES (particularly in this country where one sees a remaining mountain and decides whether it should be deforested and flattened for houses or golf courses or a but of both). Even with the P-R-W-N— I couldn’t think of PERIWINKLE forever, and then made the hail mary on LANSDSLIPS.
My twa’pen’nor on difficulty during the week – interesting idea, difficult to achieve. The New Your Times does it by grid shape more than anything – those endless fingers of obscure 3-letter words crossing long phrases or names of places or actors. The Guarniad tries, but except for the Saturday, I don’t think they really succeed. The earlier in the week puzzles lean towards cryptic definitions which make them harder for me, and the end of the week is the domain of setters I’m more familiar with (hat tip to the M man) or use more global references in constructing funny clues (ye of the 4-letter words). I don’t think it’s going to work, so I’m happy with the random sprinkling of hard and easy ones during the week (though to me we’ve had few easy ones lately).
This is what Biggles means to me
Liked 5 – ‘A motel owner screened” !!
Last in was 20 and congrats to Richard and anyone else who was actually able to work this one out! I just put it in on faith – now I see it I appreciate how clever it is.
Thanks to jlheard for the ‘Biggles’ link. I have a spot of iritis going on so ‘biggles” looks like ‘biggies’. My mind wandered there while watching the secretary in the skit.wink wink nudge nudge
affectionately
The Dirty Vicar
I Liked it. I thought the balance of subject matter was particularly good.
COD:11
Regular attempts at the puzzle combined with reading the blog will help you a lot. But so will reading Tim Moorey’s recent book about solving the Times puzzle. Of course you may be be here because you’ve just read it – he says very nice things about us. I promise I’d still have recommended the book even if he’d not mentioned us at all.
Edited at 2009-02-20 09:38 am (UTC)