Solving time: 8:50
A fairly straightforward solve – not blindingly fast, but never seriously stuck. 14 and 17 both written without full wordplay understanding. Last in were 22 and 19.
Across | |
---|---|
1 | POLY=college,AN,THUS=”in this way” – they’re all universities these days, but for the Times crossword you need to remember the poly(technic) and the tech(nical college) |
7 | BATH – 2 defs, one from Chaucer, one from a French revolution incident recorded by a painting |
9 | S=son(TUB=rev. of but = objection),BORN=destined |
10 | L from Liberals,AWFUL=terrible |
11 | PIFFLE – (F,F = “folios”), in PILE=stately home – “regarding” presumably means that if you see the clue in the grid you’re “regarding” the wordplay, but it seems a bit weak |
13 | DETR(o)IT=Motown,U.S.=America – the unnecessary country in the style of “Paris, France” should give you the end of the word |
14 | SHOC(KINGPIN)K – when solving, I was happy enough with the def. and the false notion that the ‘shock’ at the beginning was the hair |
17 | FROM=supplied by,AGE FRAIS = (Riga, safe)* – solved from def. plus recognition of the anagram. “Supplied by {a town rather than a company}” is a minor weakness that might help you break this down |
20 | TENNYS=”tennis”,ON=available |
21 | MIDWAY = “in the centre” – {I=(electric) current} replaces {E=energy} in the River Medway |
22 | PERIOD – 2 defs – a (full) stop is a period in the US – hence “period” as an equivalent of our “end of” |
23 | SENORITA – IT.=Italian vermouth=”wine”, in reason* – should have got this immediately but garbled my Mediterranean ladies and decided SIGNORA didn’t fit or contribute to wordplay |
25 | PLUG – 2 defs, one as in to “stop” a tooth |
26 | SCA(VEN.=archdeacon,GE=rev. of e.g.)RY – I started to write in SCAVENGING, but then saw that it had no role for “e.g.”, so fixed this and then used the external SCARY to make a new but plausible-looking word |
Down | |
2 | OUT=unacceptable,RIGHT=fitting |
3 | YOB – O=love in rev. of by=past |
4 | N,(m)OOSE – wordplay seen easily, but needed to find the right deer, which just happens to be a “Northern deer” |
5 | HANG=depend,DOG=setter – doubtless some will think the setter should be shamefaced for using this unindicated def by example |
6 | SOLIT=toils*,AIRE=river – solitaire is US for patience |
7 | BE WHISKE(R.E.=Royal Engineers=soldiers)D – “mutton chop whiskers” are an old-fashioned style of facial hair, sported by the former old-fashioned style of Tory M.P. Rhodes Boyson |
8 | TAUR=”tore”=gored,US |
12 | F=female,ACT=deed,F(oreign),INDING=dinin |
15 | 1,RON(SIDE)’S – ironsides were troopers in Cromwell’s army |
16 | DISASTER – SAS in tried* |
18 | AMNESIA – men* in ASIA – the other possibility for a container/anagram combo |
19 | BE = to be,FELL=deadly dangerous, as in “one fell swoop” |
21 | MAN(S(ecurity))E – manse is an alternative when rectory or vicarage are too long to fit. You need to “lift and separate” the Orwellian-sounding “security minister” |
24 | No hidden word today, so this will have to be the omitted clue |
I know that Marat was murdered in his BATH from a visit to the Chamber of Horrors at Madame Tussaud’s when I was about 8 or 9; for whatever reason the tableau of his murder stuck in my mind. Several decades went by without any further additions to this knowledge until I discovered from a recent crossword that he was a journalist. And thanks to PB for the information about IRONSIDES -I was thinking, wrongly, of a troop-carrying ship of some kind.
Might have been my first real speed solve if not for having to ponder the 19/22 intersection (as per richnorth). Hairy? Yes, but also note the double STOP, the two GAMEs and the three soldiers.
One for the sprinters.
Some nice clues here I thought. I particularly liked TAURUS, DETRITUS and DISASTER. Iraq came to mind for the latter clue / word – entirely apposite given Blair’s memoirs were published today.
Re “IT” in SENORITA. Last night I finished puzzle 69 in the Times 14 book and one of the clues was “It has been expanded (7,8)” – answer ITALIAN VERMOUTH !!
Fortunately, I had blogged the puzzle in which ‘Ironsides’ came up before, so I’ll never forget that one. ‘Midway’ also could have been difficult, but wasn’t.
Unlike other contributors so far the ones that held me up were 21 and 26 in the SE corner. MANSE went in first of the two and I never heard of SCAVENGERY so I needed to rely on wordplay to find it. I think if I hadn’t already missed the 15 minute solve I might have been tempted to bung in SCAVENGERS and hope for the best only to be disappointed later that I got one wrong so I’m pleased that I took the extra time to make sure of it.
The log-in page misses out the “enter password” screen and puts me straight to the “print puzzle” screen (as if I’d never logged out). If I then try to print I’m told “your time has expired – please log in again”. If I do that I just end up in the same spot. If I hit “log out” I’m told “your cookies are not activated”. They are and I’m getting into other sites OK. I’ve deleted all the cookies on my machine and tried again in both IE and Firefox – all to no avail.
Any ideas anybody?
Any comments would be appreciated.
I hope electronic entry isn’t too many years away – this cuts out postal non-delivery issues, and at least ensures that the times are genuine, though like the current system it can’t prevent people from consulting dictionaries.
I’d also put in MEDIAN for 21ac. I was far from happy with it and after my SHEFFIELD/MANSFIELD experience last week I took care to remember to go back but once it became clear that I wasn’t going to finish anyway I couldn’t be bothered.
I thought 17 was faulty at first since, I saw ‘for’ as part of the anagram fodder and ‘supplied by’ as a linking phrase. Although M appeared to missing, FOR was enough to get me FROMAGE.
I agree with Peter that ‘regarding’ in 11 is weak, though he’s done a fine job showing how it can be justified at a pinch. 23 displays a similar weakness with ‘for’.
Can’t really see a COD although BEWHISKERED was rather sweet. Expect something harder tomorrow!
Of course, I tried ‘me’ first.
(stop!)
Isn’t “without” to mean “containing” rather contentious? It should mean the opposite.
Anyway, if most crossword editors and setters are happy with the interpretation of “without” you describe who am I to argue?
On the point about the opposites, you’re probably right about normal conversation, but “A does not contain B” would be fairly pointless as a wordplay indication in a cryptic clue, so in that context, “B contains A” seems to me a much more relevant opposite of “A contains B”.