Times 26,003: Crosseyed And Painless

“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen pounds nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds nought and six, result misery,” said Micawber, and so it goes with crosswords too. While 15 minutes may well prove a cause for agonised soul-searching amongst the cryptic Sues and Tonys of this group, for me it’s a time realistically within my grasp, yet usually missed. So I was perfectly content with bringing this one in in 14 and a half minutes. Whatever your own arbitrary more-than-acceptable solve time is, I hope you made it on this puzzle too!

Once again I thought this was a fine specimen of Friday puzzlehood, not impossible to get started with (my FOI was the aptly self-descriptive 27A) but building towards some robust challenges. 16A and 13D were two words I thought might give people trouble, though for some reason I’m well up on my unusual Latinate terms for eye disorders, to the point where I briefly wondered if it might be NYSTAGMUS; grape varieties I’m less confident on, but was able to dredge up a memory of seeing such a word as 13D from somewhere.

The military man at 10A was a funny one: the MARSHAL part was the first part of the puzzle I cracked, but I BIFD in the other half once I had the crossing letters, and fully resolved the wordplay only in the aftermath. I also never really saw how 2D is “special treatment”, though the solution was all clear enough from the letters and wordplay. On the surfaces front, all was very neat and tidy: I’d hold up the aforementioned 15A as a very efficient clue, one of many such. On the smile-raising front I liked the police harassment of the poor old newspaperman who should have worn a suit, so I’ll make that my COTD I think…

Across
1 POMFRET – sort of cake: (FROM*) [“nuts”] inside PET [dear]
5 REGULAR – soldier: RA LUGER [Royal Artillery (with) gun] “retreating”
9 LOG – record: L{ots} O{f} G{reat} “No. 1s”, i.e. first letters
10 EARL MARSHAL – army officer: EARL{y} [“brief” in time] + MARSHAL, homophone of “martial” [of war, “it’s said”]
11 MACHETES – pointed weapons: M [male] + SET [group “recoiling”] “pierced by” ACHE [long]
12 PAST IT – now undrinkable?: ASTI [wine] in P{in}T [pint “container”]
15 CHUM – friend: CHUMP [fool] minus P [“to lose” money]
17 STRABISMUS – (an eye) problem: “recurring” SUMS I BARTS [problems (with) eye “reported” (by) hospital]
18 PULLED OVER – stopped by police: “casually-dressed newspaperman”, i.e. ED in PULLOVER
19 TRAM – public transport: R [runs] “on” T [time] + A.M. [in the morning]
22 ACTION – case: (COAT IN*) [“stuffed”]
23 REJOINED – double def
25 GO BY THE BOOK – follow the rules: homophone of “go buy the book”
27 LYE – solution: {real}LY E{asy} “partly spelled out”
28 DODDERY – rather senile: ODDER [stranger] “taken in by” {la}DY [lady, “not half”]
29 EXPLOIT – feat: EX PILOT [old aviator] with the I [one] “positioned closer to the rear”

Down
1 POLEMIC – attack: MIC{e} [vermin “mostly”] “with” POLE [big stick]
2 MAGIC BULLET – special treatment: MA LET [mother | allowed] “to go around” GI [private] + (CLUB*) [“arranged”]
3 REEFER – drug-filled cigarette: REF E’ER [whistle-blower | always] “rolling”
4 TURKEY TROT – dance: TUR{n} [go, “briefly”] + TORT [wrong “doing the twist”] “after” KEY [main]
5 RIME – double def, frost / old-fashioned verse [as in “of the Ancient Mariner”]
6 GERMANIC – European: R + EG [king, say] “turned” + MANIC [mad]
7 LAH – note: LA{s}H [cat] “has abandoned” S [“last of” kittens]
8 RELATES – tells: RE [about] + SLATE [part of roof] “top falling away”, i.e. the S dropping down
13 TEMPRANILLO – wine fruit: RAN ILL [quickly went | bad] “in” TEMPO [time]
14 PATE DE FOIE – French course: PATE [head] “gets” DEFOE [author] “to introduce” I [current]
17 DEPORTEE – banished person: ROPED [tied “up”] against T{r}EE [tree, “not right”]
18 PRANGED – crashed: P [parking] + RANGE [Sierra] + {roa}D [“close to” road]
20 MIDWEST – somewhere in America: SEW D [join | daughter] “over” in M.I.T. [college]
21 COOK UP – devise: OK [sanction] “during” COUP [revolutionary activity]
24 SEXY – attractive: {cop}SE [copse “lawman cut”] + X Y [axes]
26 BAD – not healthy: B{r}A{n}D{y} [brandy “taken regularly”]

57 comments on “Times 26,003: Crosseyed And Painless”

  1. Ran way over the 30′ mark, thanks to a small number of recalcitrant clues, 14d being the most such, but also 5ac–couldn’t think of a gun–13d (never heard of it), and 16ac, which I actually put in once I had the M, but couldn’t justify until much later. Took me a while to see ‘stuffed’ as an anagram indicator. I hesitated at EARL MARSHAL, since I didn’t think that was a military rank–isn’t he a bigwig in the Herald’s College? Liked COOK UP, REJOINED, GO BY THE BOOK, and PULLED OVER.
    1. Someone on the forum suggested that “army” might be a whimsical way of referring to the arms involved in heraldry.
      1. Whoa, something did feel odd about that as a military rank but I was pressing ahead too fast to think it through. I like the heraldic explanation – atrocious puns good!
  2. Having run just over an hour I needed aids to fill in the last unchecked letter as I had simply run out of steam (something repeated later when I tackled the Quickie). It was such an appalling oversight on my part that I can’t even bring myself to divulge details here, but I’m seriously beginning to wonder if my brain is starting to give out.

    Before all that I was very pleased to come up with TEMPRANILLO which I never heard of (if somebody finds that I wrote about it before in a puzzle I blogged myself, please don’t tell me) and also LYE. I got STRABISMUS but was unable to parse it.

    Edited at 2015-01-23 07:43 am (UTC)

  3. Like jackkt, I was very pleased with myself for working out TEMPRANILLO and LYE. SEXY, likewise.

    I came unstuck, however, with the French course, which I doubt I’d have got if I’d thought about it all day.

    One or two clues here slightly above my pay grade.

  4. Too good for me I’m afraid. Got TEMPRANILLO and STRABISMUS tentatively from the wordplay, but resorted to aids to confirm they existed.

    Would never have known PATE DE FOIE (do you get fries with that?). Maybe a consonant in the checkers would have helped, but by then it was all too late anyway.

    Nice to see some variety in the levels of difficulty. Thanks setter and blogger.

    1. I would have thought PATE DE FOIE GRAS was reasonably common (if ethically dubious). Can’t recall ever having seen an unqualified “pate de foie” though.

      Edited at 2015-01-23 11:21 am (UTC)

      1. Pate de foie is simply liver pate as distinct say from crab pate but almost certainly not goose because the ingredients of foie gras are covered by French law
      2. I agree with you, Verlaine.
        I’ve been married to a Frenchwoman and lived in France for the last ten years. I’ve never seen just “pate de foie” without the “gras”. It actually sounds rather strane.
          1. Yes, it seems clear that there is such a thing as “pâté de foie” (what I’d call “liver paté” in English I think)… though it’s suggestive that if you Google the term you do get a page of mostly foie gras.
  5. 19m for a puzzle that felt harder than that to me. In several cases I was spared the need to work out the tortuous wordplay by happening to know the terms in question:
    > STRABISMUS. No idea how I knew this, but I did. I never figured out the wordplay.
    > PATE DE FOIE. Speaking French helped here, and in fact it strikes me as a requirement, which is a bit off. Mind you we’re often expected to have some knowledge of Latin, and at least French has been regularly taught in schools in the last half century.
    > TEMPRANILLO. I always find it a bit odd when grape varieties are clued as ‘wine’, which is what I thought was going on with 13dn as I bunged it in from what turned out not to be the definition. It’s the main ingredient in Rioja, and the same grape as Tinto Fino in the Ribera del Duero.
    1. I think the definition is “wine fruit” rather than just “wine” which I twigged straight away was a grape

      I’m amazed folk haven’t heard of this grape because, as you say, it is the main constituent of Rioja and they must surely have drunk that at some time

      1. “they must surely have drunk that at some time”. I think that’s why I couldn’t remember.
      2. Yes, I realised that when I read the blog. I’m not so surprised: I don’t think most people are aware of the grape varieties that constitute most famous wines, and there’s no reason they should be. Like the friend who told me that yes, she liked white Burgundy: ‘anything but chardonnay.’
        1. Ha, wish I had a pound for every time I’ve heard that one, I could have bought a case myself. I do think there are reasons why they should know of the grape varieties that constitute famous wines though. How much interest in life does it take to read the label and not just glug it straight down? Even a premier cru Chablis will usually mention the grape variety on the back label these days. I make a point of asking everyone who drinks my wine what they think of it, at some point. Usually the response is a guilty start and another sip so they can actually notice what they are drinking!
          You can become an expert on wine just by making a resolution to take the trouble to notice it, as it goes down
          1. You can, but I don’t see why you should. I have no interest in plants, for example, and I don’t beat myself up about it. My wife is very happy drinking my wine without knowing the first thing about it, and I can’t say it bothers me.
            1. I think you should, because effectively it comes free (since you are drinking the wine anyway) and it improves your appreciation of the wine to understand something about it; and it helps you to stop being quoted like that friend you mentioned. And it helps with solving crossword clues 😉 but it doesn’t bother me either, not much does these days
              1. I shall drink a couple of carefully chosen bottles before attempting next week’s solve and blog, and we can measure the potential benefits of indulgence scientifically!
                1. Excellent! Though perhaps not immediately before, or it may affect the solving time … also what I was suggesting had nothing to do with indulgence; rather the opposite if anything 😉
  6. Around 23 minutes, thwarted from prompt submission by a connection failure.
    STRABISMUS for me is always preceded by Dr and followed by (whom God preserve) of Utrecht: my family didn’t always take The Times. Only later in life did I discover that it was also an eye disorder.
    Couldn’t work out:
    Why (p)RELATES was anything to do with roofs
    Where the hospital was in STRABISMUS – though in truth I didn’t really try
    Where the EARL came from and why
    Whether TEMPRA-thingy was wine-related: I just followed the paint by numbers instructions.
    Whether MACHETES necessarily have a point: surely the point of a machete is that it has an edge? I genuinely didn’t enter that until it couldn’t be anything else.
    (For quite some time) where the BUL came from in MAGIC BULLET. Club is always just C. But BUL doesn’t mean arranged…
    Good Friday challenge, blessings on Verlaine (and compliments on a fine time) for unscrewing the inscrutable.
  7. Another middle of the road good quality puzzle that was a reasonable test without being taxing. Some good quality clues here combined with very good surface readings. Well done setter.

    Commiserations Jack. You’re not alone. I know I’m going slowly down hill including a very strange episode with last sunday’s Mephisto

  8. . . . with unknown TEMPRANILLO guessed from the parsing. Like z8, STRABISMUS came to me from Beachcomber. Some good stuff here so thank you setter and verlaine.
  9. 24 mins. Yes, there was some good stuff here, but there were also a few clues that annoyed me. I don’t like “recurring” as a reversal indicator so it took me a while to parse STRABISMUS even though I was fairly sure it was the answer. I agree with Z8 that a MACHETE is an edged weapon rather than a pointed one. Finally, I have never seen 14dn without “gras” on the end of it and, partly due to the extremely unhelpful checkers, it was my LOI when I finally parsed it.
  10. A very satisfying Friday for the most part, and beating my normal 2(Magoo) target suggests I was definitely “in the zone”, as modern sportsmen say. While gardening is my blind spot, food and drink is one of my strengths, so luckily not caught out by the pate or the grape. Most delays were self-inflicted, such as a determination to force MAGIC CIRCLE into 2dn against the odds; though I also hesitated over EARL MARSHAL being a military title – I think I must have come across him because he’s the high functionary who organises state funerals and coronations and the like, which also suggest that even if the job once involved soldiering, it certainly doesn’t today.
  11. Hi there, long-time lurker, finally got an account.

    I enjoyed today’s crossword, though I found it hard and didn’t do too very well (I give myself twenty minutes each day and stop wherever I’m at. Today I had about ten clues outstanding). But I have an issue with 3d and 4d. Both contain anagrams of words not contained in the clues. 4d has an anagram of TORT; 3d has, unless I’ve missed something, two such anagrams: REF and EER. This doesn’t seem cricket to me.

    Thoughts?

    1. In both cases they’re strict reversals rather than just anagrams… indirect anagrams are frowned upon but as far as I know indirect reversals are quite kosher.
    2. There are, of course, anagrams and anagrams…

      In 3d you need to find REF and E’ER, put them together and reverse them. In 4d, “doing the twist” in this case is another reversal indicator, so even though you’d expect it normally to indicate an anagram, the same applies i.e. it’s reversing a deduced word (which I suppose you could say is producing a very specific type of anagram).

      I’d agree there is a fine line between indirect anagrams and reversing indirectly defined words, even if it’s only that the same rules clearly don’t apply to the latter. What the “rules” are is a whole different story, of course – there are no Crossword Police – but I think you’re right to suggest that indirect anagrams are a no-no in most cryptic circles.

      P.S. Welcome aboard.

  12. I don’t think I go in for agonised soul-searching – it certainly didn’t occur to me to do so today when I finished in 16:37 with an tiny application of Tippex – just a feeling of ‘that’s the toughest one this week! I certainly didn’t feel 28a or 12a either.
      1. Measuring yourself against Magoo is good practice for learning to live with the unfairness of life. The Stoic philosophers would have told us this, if only there had been crosswords in classical Greece.
      2. they might if they’d remembered they got within a smidge over two minutes more than his time yesterday.
  13. Thanks, you’re quite right. I didn’t stop to notice that both instances were actually indirect reversals, which are of course fair game. The reversal indicators seem more imaginative than usual – ‘doing the twist’, ‘rolling’. They seem, in fact, like anagram indicators. So uh, yeah. My bad. 😉
  14. Hmm, quite surprised at some of the ignorance-admitteds. Tempranillo took me 2 seconds, less for the pate, admittedly they are playing to one of my strengths, ie gluttony. And how come 25 comments and no mention yet of Dr Strabismus of Utrecht, Whom God Preserve?
      1. In his book, “T Force, the Race for Nazi War Scientists”, Sean Longdon writes:

        “At Utrecht the unit detained a Dr Strabismus, scientist who had earned his place on the [Combined Intelligence Objectives Sub-committee] list due to his research on perpetual motion. The doctor was an interesting find since he was last reported as working in Spain in 1944.”

        Yours is not the only occasion when a reference to the good doctor has escaped proper notice.

        1. The good doctor made a late appearance on the Club Forum. Busy today so didn’t look here until just now. I did wonder if “disgusted in Tunbridge” came from the same Beachcomber source but apparently not. My little brother (12 years younger) was born with a bad squint which had to be surgically corrected when he was about 3 so I knew the medical term too.

          The one I had trouble with was the pate de quelque chose, and this despite the fact that I’ve made the stuff myself using foie de volaille (aka chicken livers -50cents at the local supermarket because most people throw them away). Delicious just so long as you don’t see it made.

          Also must have been thinking of “red carpet treatment” in 2d because I left the rug in there far too long. Something around 29 minutes.

          Edited at 2015-01-23 11:06 pm (UTC)

  15. Count me in as another that didn’t like pointy machetes. I own one and it certainly wouldn’t be my choice for doing anything other than chopping, rather than piercing.
    Couldn’t parse strabismus, which I got from the checkers, or sexy – thanks for the explanation. Must remember x&y for axes!
  16. Out of my league today – unfinished in 60m so very grateful for the blog. I doubt I would have got the cake, the pate, sexy or the eye disease however long I had looked. No chance to BIFD them either as unhelpful letters for that. All in all rather a chewy and unforgiving puzzle.

    Edited at 2015-01-23 05:51 pm (UTC)

  17. No knowledge gaps today but more BIFD’s than I’m happy with. 23 minutes felt like a very good time for me for this puzzle.
  18. About 30 minutes, so on the tougher side for me, but I didn’t have any of the mentioned knowledge gaps. LOI was SEXY. TEMPRANILLO on its own, not in a blend, is worth a taste for those who care to. Regards.
  19. Kept coming back to this one, but too hard for me. Left with a couple of blanks and several not understood. Thanks, Verlaine, for working it all out, and thanks setter. As has been remarked it’s good to have a variety of puzzles.
  20. Well after bucking the trend and racing through yesterday, today I slammed right into the brick wall and took about five short sessions to get to the end of this one, though in the end everything made perfect sense, I was just so far away from the wavelength of the setter that I was probably appearing behind them. Oh well… loved the wordplay for STRABISMUS and I’ve had a few TEMPRANILLOs so that was one that did go in the first time.
  21. I wasn’t too unhappy with my 12:27, though as usual there were a number of clues I made heavy weather of. (I actually went as far as to bung in REPAIRS (anag. of P + SIERRA) for 18dn, assuming that they were what the road was closed for!)

    Fortunately PATE DE FOIE went straight in before I had any of those horrid checked vowels to put me off; and luckily the wordplay for the unfamiliar TEMPRANILLO made it seem pretty certain. (It’s not that I don’t enjoy food and wine; it’s just that my tastes are very ordinary. In fact as far as wine is concerned, a nice bottle of claret or Sancerre is all I ever want. Oh, and a glass or two of champagne at weddings.)

    It’s possible (even probable) that I first encountered STRABISMUS through Beachcomber’s good doctor (Whom God Preserve).

  22. I forgot to mention that “army” referring to things heraldic is an old chestnut, though I don’t recall seeing it recently.
  23. Well, I got there, but battered and bruised after an hour and a few minutes. EARL MARSHAL was unknown to me, and I spent a long time trying —S MARTIAL, with the “brief” being SMART. No, I know it doesn’t work. In the end, EARL MARSHAL went in unparsed and uncertainly. TURKEY TROT was my LOI.

    PATE DE FOIS went in fairly easily but, as some others have commented, it’s a bit too French for my taste. As for the ethical dubiety of foie gras, I believe its production is quite painless, unless the geese try to nip your fingers as you’re force-feeding them. I object to it on principle, but in practice it is far too delicious to eschew.

    Edited at 2015-01-24 12:50 am (UTC)

    1. The production of foie gras can be perfectly humane. If you’re concerned for animal welfare you’d do better to eschew bacon.
  24. Certainly not painless.
    My FOI (27a) was ‘really easy’ i.e. easy as ABC and ‘partly spelled out’. Pretty obvious to me. Must be on the way down.
  25. New to this forum, but am moved to vent my irritation at a clue which proclaims machetes to be “pointed weapons”; absolutely not — has the setter never seen a machete? It’s more of a butcher’s cleaver, a flat blade, perhaps with a gentle curve. Here’s my Ox Dict of Eng “a broad heavy knife used as…”
    1. I’ve done more research on machetes than I ever expected I’d do in my life since this puzzle, and while it seems clear that *some* machetes have points, I would certainly agree that “pointed weapon” is a definition on a par with Samuel Johnson’s infamous “knee of a horse” for “pastern”…

Comments are closed.