Solving time: 47:51, which felt like quite a good time. In fact at the time of writing, with the crossword having been online for some two hours, there is still only one sub 40 minute time on the leader board.
Some quite devious tricks amongst this lot, and very little that could be considered obvious, so it’s tricky to pick any to omit from the blog. Overall, I found this an enjoyable challenge. I think POLYGLOT gets my COD as the pick of the bunch.
I do have a couple of disputes, however, with 3 & 4 down, both of which I have covered below – and both of which can be put down to the limitations of my dictionary.
cd = cryptic def., dd = double def., rev = reversal, homophones are written in quotes, anagrams as (–)*, and removals like this
Across | |
---|---|
1 | BRIEF + EN + COUNTER – David Lean’s classic 1945 romantic drama. |
9 | EDWARDIAN = (IDEA DRAWN)* |
10 | WHIRL = |
11 | DIRGE = EG (for one) + RID (shot) all rev |
12 | HOT SPRING – It took me a while to decrypt this one. I was expecting Spooner to be a reference to the verbally confused reverend, but it isn’t. ‘Spooner’s helping’ = TSP for teaspoon, in H (hospital) + O / RING (circles) |
13 | NOSE CONE = CO (poisonous gas – carbon monoxide) in (SEEN ON)* |
15 | rev hidden |
17 | BIG + AMY – I suspect I’ve seen all four of Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women crop up at some point or other, so it’s worth remembering them. They are Jo, Meg, Beth and Amy. |
19 | TOR + TILL + A |
22 | TARKOVSKY – another one that I didn’t break down until afterwards. It’s TV + SKY (satellite broadcaster) about ARK (box) + O (over, a standard cricket abbreviation). Andrei Tarkovsky was a much respected Russian film director. |
23 | SYLPH = alt letters of |
24 |
|
25 | ILL TEMPER = LL (lines) in ITEM (article) + PER (a) |
26 | STRAIGHT AS A DIE = SIGHT + A + SADIE about ART rev |
Down | |
1 | BREAD-AND-BUTTER = READ in B-AND-B + UTTER |
2 | INWARDS = IN WORDS but with an A for the central O |
3 | FORCE – dd presumably, although I’m not really sure how fall & force are synonymous. A force is a waterfall, apparently. Thanks to the various people who pointed it out. |
4 | NEIGHING = WEIGHING with the initial letter changed from W (west) to N (north). I remain entirely unconvinced, though, that a punch is a type of horse. There is a breed of shire horse called the Suffolk Punch, but as far as I can tell, this is just a breed name and the two words cannot be treated independently. It is indeed a type of horse, if one looks in the right dictionary. |
5 | OF NOTE = (OFTEN + O)* |
6 | NEWSPRINT – a ‘new sprint’ is not an ancient marathon |
7 | ELITIST = LIT in |
8 | FLOG A DEAD HORSE = (LODGERS AHEAD OF)* |
14 | COMMONER + A |
16 | POLYGLOT – another one that might need some explanation. ‘Interpreter, potentially’ is the definition, ‘good’ = G, ‘one with Dutch looking back’ = LOT (Dutch is a cockney term for wife, so this is a reference to the biblical account of Lot’s flight from Sodom where his wife looked back and was turned into a pillar of salt), and ‘college once’ = POLY. |
18 | GERAINT = REG (what’s on a plate for motorist) reversed (needing lift) + AIN’T (isn’t commonly), the ‘available’ is just padding |
20 | LILY PAD = (ALL DIY)* about P |
21 | deliberately omitted |
23 | SPECS = “SPECKS” |
I got off to a bad start, having read through the clues solving any of them. I hadn’t heard of BRIEF ENCOUNTER, TARKOVSKY and GERAINT but they weren’t too hard to guess with plenty of checking letters.
Chambers gives FORCE=a waterfall for 3dn, and also has punch=a short-legged draught horse … (also Suffolk punch)
I thought ‘polyglot’ was brilliant. At first, I was trying to us ‘linguist’, but couldn’t make it work. I didn’t get ‘force’, either, but that must be it.
Nice work, Dave, that would have been tough to solve under the pressure of having to blog.
Should have seen force = waterfall, as I’ve come across a few while walking in the Lakes. I think the word may be used further south in the Yorkshire Dales too.
At 80 minutes I gave up on the final unsolved clue at 22ac and looked up the Russian of whom I have never heard. In trying to unravel the wordplay I should have spotted that TV was separate from the ‘satellite broadcaster’ cluing SKY.
But despite all the difficulties encountered along the way, the puzzle was an absolute cracker. One of the best we’ve had for ages.
Meant to thank you for holding the fort on Wednesday.
Ta — McT
As in Scale Force in the north!
You wouldn’t want to see one of these every day (especially when you might be the blogger – well done, Dave) but it’s good to have the occasional puzzle that requires a lot of chewing over, even at the risk of having more DNFs than usual. Plus, it makes the online leaderboard look authentic for a change, though presumably the likes of potterman will eventually solve even this one and claim another sub-3 minute time.
Anyway, lots of hard staring followed by sudden penny-dropping, for which I tip my hat to the setter.
So thanks, Dave, for a super blog to match the crossword. Even though I entered HOT SPRING, I’d got nowhere your full parsing, etc …
3 hours to arrive at a completed grid although this did include periods considering various alternative early morning activities that might be better for my ego.
Speaking personally, I gave up on the practice some time ago with no observable effect – a) I didn’t mention that I was doing so, and b) nobody appeared to notice. Having a look back at the early days, I think that custom and practice have changed: for a typical daily puzzle five years ago, a blogger might only pick out a dozen or so tricky clues for analysis, leaving people to bring up others in comments if necessary. I imagine this is because there were fewer bloggers back then (and in fact just the one blogger, of course, if you go back far enough), whereas these days we spread the workload more evenly, and each of us presumably feels able to devote more time to their more manageable share of it. Anyway, I can see the point of leaving gaps if you’re only analysing one clue in three; but I must admit it seems perverse to blog 28 or 29 clues and not finish the job by doing one more…
Lots of brilliant stuff in here. I think “one with Dutch looking back” is magnificent, for instance. And there’s some very cunning misdirection, such as the use of Spooner in 12ac.
I wondered about “fall”, and I also thought “measure of boxer” in 4dn was “weigh-in” and wondered where the G came from. But of course it’s “getting measure of boxer”. Fortunately I remembered punch from puzzles past.
My last in was TARKOVSKY. I’ve never heard of him so it needed careful construction from wordplay. Again there is deviousness here. “Over” is not, as I thought, a reversal indicator. And having got onto the wavelength of this devious setter it took me ages to see that TV is just… TV.
Superb puzzle, thanks setter.
BIGAMY came as a relief at 17; with a couple of checkers in place I thought for one shocking moment we were going to have a repeat of BOSOMY.
[taking deep breath because my attempts at logical analysis usually end in tears here] I’m never quite happy with the syntax in clues like the one for TARKOVSKY. It’s not really ‘TV satellite broadcaster’ which carries the ‘box over’. It’s ‘TV’ which does that. Wouldn’t there be more logic in:
‘needs TV to carry box before receiving satellite broadcaster’?
or
‘needs box installed in TV before getting satellite broadcaster’?
Just asking.
Fine puzzle. Loved BRIEF ENCOUNTER.
More importantly though you would lose the need to lift and separate “TV satellite broadcaster”, which is one of the best things about the clue.
Lots to like here, but one apparent howler: given that SPECS (23dn) is a noun, it could just about be defined as “help with seeing“, but it can’t be defined as “help to see” any more than it could be defined as “assistance to see“, because (unless I’m missing something) these aren’t intelligible as noun phrases. (I’m discounting the possibility that the Times would allow a verb phrase to define a noun, as in “loves wine” for OENOPHILE.)
Early doors I got the right and bottom long answers but they weren’t half as helpful as the other two would have been at that stage.
I’ve been to both Aysgarth Force and Hardraw Force in the Dales so I saw 3d quickly enough. I have to say I’m surprised at the lack of familiarity with Brief Encounter. Where else does one learn how to remove grit from a lady’s eye?
COD to Geraint which I expected to be rarebit.
Super puzzle.
A difficult puzzle I think with lots of very clever stuff a great deal of which had to be worked out after finishing. Interested to see that people admire the use of “dutch” as a direct substitution for “wife” with no indication of slang usage. So far as I know Lot was not from the East End so this could be considered a bit of a stretch. At the same time ‘eist is clued as “East End” although it is not a word that the average barrow boy would use
Excellent puzzle. I screwed up on specs though and put in steps (to help see over a wall maybe)
John D