Solving time: 54:27, with 22 minutes spent on the last 4 answers.
Started off steadily enough, but started to slow down as I neared the end. Then ground to a halt on the last 4 (4/8/21/27) which took me an age to crack. This happens to me a lot, and it can be extremely annoying.
Not much to say about it. A few mildly interesting bits of wordplay, but nothing outstanding. The hour is late, so I’ll move swiftly on to the clue breakdown.
cd = cryptic def., dd = double def., rev = reversal, homophones are written in quotes, anagrams as (–)*, and removals like this
Across | |
---|---|
1 | WIN + TRY |
4 | ESPOUSAL = O |
9 | S(HERB)ET |
11 |
|
12 | OVER + T |
13 | NEPTUNIAN = (PEANUT IN + N)* |
14 | SI(G + NATURE)S |
16 | MES |
19 | NOEL – because HOTEL with ‘no EL’ = HOT |
20 | ALPHABETIC = CITE rev after LP in AHAB |
22 | DIAGNOSIS = I + SONG + AID all rev + |
23 | R(ADO)N |
25 | deliberately omitted |
26 | RE(AD + I)LY |
27 | STRA(TEG)Y – A TEG is a two-year old sheep. It’s one of those words that only ever crops up in crosswords. TUP is another sheep-related word worth remembering. STRAY = chance in the sense of ‘to stray upon something’. I forgot about TEG, and got held up trying to fit TUP or RAM in to something. My last in. |
28 | STO |
Down | |
1 | WIS |
2 | deliberately omitted |
3 | RE(BUTT)AL |
5 | STEEPLECHASER = (LESS PACE THERE)* |
6 | O + U + T(P)UT |
7 | SE(N + TIME)NT |
8 | L + EARN – As soon as I see ‘home’, I automatically think IN and I can find it very difficult to move away from that. |
10 | TONGUE-LASHING = TON + GUSHING about ALE rev (from the south). What did I say a few weeks ago about TON = fashion turning up in every future blog I write? Well there it is again! |
15 | GRENADIER = (REGAINED)* + R |
17 | HACK + NE(Y)ED = Stock as in ‘a stock response’ |
18 | ABE(R + RAN)T |
21 |
|
22 | D( |
24 | DRILL – A monkey can certainly be a hammer or a ram, but I’m not so sure about a drill. Apparently a drill is a kind of monkey, rather than the other way around. |
A ‘drill’ is a kind of monkey, or so I supposed. Subsequent research has proven that theory correct.
46 minutes and by no means easy; but perhaps the most satisfying of the week, especially for those of us who like complex operations on sophisticated fodder and then get seriously held up by simpler mechanisms: 21dn and 27ac (cf Dave’s situation).
I’m giving my COD to 2dn (NIECE): a word oft encountered; but clued here in a non-obvious way.
Overall verdict: very enjoyable, with some clever concealments (eg championship and stock). Just under an hour, all up, plus several minutes more to understand why it was NOEL.
Found this tricky, not least because I couldn’t get going in the NW for some reason (WISCONSIN, mainly). Like Dave, I also struggled with 4 (my last in and COD) and 8. Today the blogger proves his value by filling me in on the rationales behind 10, 18, 19 and 22. Congratulations to both him and the setter.
That is probably why newbies and low intermediates advance their skills rapidly when they start reading it.
The really hard part, which I have never been able to do, is to speed up the process. I think the really fast solvers must have started young. Of course, as an American, a lot of the knowledge such as cricket and football is not natural to me, so I have to mull it over.
l-t-n and didn’t fancy Latin or Luton. So a pathetic letin for some kind of pick, that takes you home, and two wrong in 34 minutes. Ouch. Anyhow this was more like the jab at the start of the day that I need to wake up.
I’d forgotten (man)drill, so assumed the existence of the monkey drill (I bet they have one on oil rigs). otherwise a decent set of clues, with some of the definitions (ESPOUSAL, HACKNEYED) more devious than the wordplay.
CoD to WINTRY for simplicity.
espousal = championship; earn = take home; stock = hackneyed; strategy = approach; diagnosis = identification.
Guesses for TEG = sheep and DRILL from mandrill. Only 3 after 20 minutes so very happy to finish in about 90. Thank you setter.
Last in and COD to NOEL: it’s nice when the penny drops like that.
As a relative newbie, I would like to reiterate the words of Mr Lawson yesterday, and add my appreciation for this blog – a fantastic resource for anyone attempting to crack the venerable Times xword. I have learnt so much from our setters/bloggers/contributors, and continue to do so on a daily basis. When you get to a certain age, you can sometimes forget how rewarding learning a new skill can be!
Thanks to all, and hope you all have a great weekend! J
The NE corner taxed me the most with the defs for espousal and learn hard to spot and the goddess, not having trainers or planets named after her, being unfamiliar.
About 10 minutes at the end to justify INTACT and arrive at ESPOUSAL.
Several COD candidates, but I’m with Jimbo in admiring the economy of WINTRY.
p.s. well done, Tony Sever, on spotting what was apparently a ‘nina’ in yesterday’s puzzle.
Some explanation here: http://www.crosswordunclued.com/2009/10/what-is-nina.html
Some examples from The Times blogged here: http://www.livejournal.com/tools/memories.bml?user=times_xwd_times&keyword=Themes%20and%20Ninas&filter=all
I don’t know if yesterday’s is confirmed, but Tony’s suggestion is pretty convincing (see his comment now on page 2 of yesterday’s comments).
Louise
Louise
The puzzle? 39 minutes with lots of interruptions. NOEL was rather neat, wasn’t it?
Thanks to Dave for the blog and the amusing reminder of Vesta curries, our idea of exotic cuisine in 1960s Britain.
Nice puzzle to end the week – Wis-con-sin makes me think of Perry Como’s ‘Delaware’… and that’s pre Vesta!
i would like to add my appreciation to that expressed earlier by saying how useful i have found this blog. having started only about three months ago, i am chuffed to be able to finish a crossword such as this, albeit with aids and some guesswork.
ak
ak
On the subject of Ninas, there’s more about them in my old RTC FAQ. Sadly Race the Clock is no more, having been superseded by the Times Crossword Club’s home-brew competition, but this too is based on the T2 Concise puzzle (compiled for the last several years by John Grimshaw) and I assume there’s still a daily competition (now adjudicated by Heyesey) to spot the Nina (if there is one).