Quick Cryptic 2554 by Hurley

Author   CuraristPosted on Categories Quick Cryptic

Nothing to scare the horses from Hurley this morning. A nice compact puzzle that I solved in just over 5 minutes. There’s a cross-reference at 5dn which I know some think shouldn’t be in the QC, but it’s quite a simple one. It occurs to me that cross-references always seem to refer forwards, i.e. to clues you haven’t done yet, which makes them chewier than they need be. Am I imagining it?

Across
1 Collection of beach pebbles, not hard — one only (6)
SINGLE – SHINGLE minus H for hard
4 Reportedly become aware of American count (6)
CENSUS – sounds like ‘sense’ + US
8 A French proviso a learner finds categorical (13)
UNCONDITIONAL – UN (a, French) + CONDITION (proviso) + A + L
10 Be in great need of Conservative party? (5)
CRAVE – C + RAVE
11 Is feeling cold in small area of activity by river, sunless initially (7)
SHIVERS – S + HIVE (area of activity) + R (river)+ S[unless]
13 Lack of knowledge of racing — one at sea (9)
IGNORANCE – anagram (‘at sea’) of RACING ONE
17 Past love, Tim, originally called around (3-4)
ONE-TIME – O (love) + TIM with NÉE (originally called) outside
18 Regularly missing usual uncle’s piquancy (5)
SAUCE – alternate letters
19 One seeking very best refit pics — note resort needed (13)
PERFECTIONIST – anagram (‘resort needed’) of REFIT PICS NOTE
21 Sword charge? That is right (6)
RAPIER – RAP (charge, as in rap sheet) + IE + R
22 Some intervene — erasing superficial display (6)
VENEER – hidden word
Down
1 Bitter, extremely credible, informant (6)
SOURCE – SOUR + C[redibl]E
2 Fruit, fine (not half!) — certain to be reordered (9)
NECTARINE – NE (half of ‘fine’) + anagram (‘to be reordered’) of CERTAIN
3 Move suddenly forward in swim? Not at first (5)
LUNGE – PLUNGE minus first letter
5 Issue of 6 maybe, ode in it surprisingly? (7)
EDITION – Cross reference from 6dn – i.e ‘issue of The Sun maybe’. anagram (‘surprisingly’) of ODE IN IT
6 Tabloid relative mentioned (3)
SUN – Sounds like SON
7 Ostentatious display cut — power intervenes (6)
SPLASH – SLASH with P for power inserted
9 Rising in South calling for immediate action (9)
INSURGENT – IN + S + URGENT
12 Senior worker no longer — energy reduction I’ve seen finally (9)
EXECUTIVE – EX + E + CUT + IVE. Not sure what the ‘seen finally’ is doing, though I suppose it needs something to finish off the sentence.
14 Want of sophistication in arena I ‘ve tested (7)
NAÏVETÉ – hidden French word
15 Police officer’s helicopter losing height (6)
COPPER – CHOPPER minus H for height
16 Society girl at first turns on Romeo — one owing money (6)
DEBTOR – DEB + T[urns] + O[n] + R
18 Ray said something (5)
SPOKE – double definition
20 Move fast for rent (3)
RIP – Double definition

63 comments on “Quick Cryptic 2554 by Hurley”

  1. Nice finish to the week. All done in 32m.
    FOI: UNCONDITIONAL
    LOI: INSURGENT after removing Insurrect. I’ve heard of an insurgent but never seen it used as a rising. However it was a nice clue.
    COD: CENSUS.
    Thanks Hurley and Curarist.
    Happy Christmas to one and all.

  2. After yesterday’s struggles, I thought this was a reasonable end to the week at 12:36 – against my handicap that is birdie territory. Might be the first time I remembered a flower can also be a river. I didn’t notice the various MERs raised whilst solving but that is probably a reflection on my poor vocabulary.
    Happy Christmas to all and thanks to Curarist and Hurley.

  3. I didn’t have any qualms about SOURCE, justifying it as Guy did. Only SPOKE gave me pause at the end, although I had to use all available neurons to work my way through the other clues to get under my target time. SINGLE was FOI. 9:04. Thanks Hurley and Curarist.

  4. You may wish to avoid what follows as it has no Christmas cheer whatsoever.

    I am in despair (again) at my total, unforgivable idiocy and inability to get the most simple clues. I’ve made some daft mistakes in my time here, but this one will take some beating.

    Needless to say, I failed once more to make my weekly target (5 solves in under 2 hours). I put RUN for RIP and had RANIER for RAPIER as a result. I knew the latter was wrong and meant to go back and check at the end. However I was so obsessed with my time that I forgot to do this and so recorded a DNF, with two incorrect answers.

    When I looked at the clock, I had ‘finished’ in 25 mins, so had more than enough time remaining (13 mins) to check and still meet my target for the week. I felt under so much time pressure today that I didn’t enjoy it at all, regardless of not finishing.

    Another day of failure, incompetence and stupidity. I had 38 mins to play with to meet my target and I still messed it up. I am desperately unhappy at today’s result as I thought that I might meet my target for only the second time this year. The fact that I should have done this easily makes it even worse. If I hadn’t put so much pressure on myself, I would have had no problem meeting my goal as I would very quickly have spotted and corrected my error. A self-inflicted wound that will take some time to recover from.

    I will spend yet another weekend berating myself and feeling wretched, when only yesterday I felt so positive. I have had a rotten last six months on the QC, and, just when I thought there was a bit of light at the end of the tunnel, I have another disastrous day. How can I achieve a 16 min solve yesterday and then have such a nightmare today? I fear that I will never get the hang of this.

    To compound my misery, I had a horror show on the Quintagram today, getting only one answer and not even understanding two of the clues. I really am useless at times.

    Thanks for the blog today, and thank you to all of the bloggers for the great work they do throughout the year.

    I hope you all have an enjoyable Christmas.

    1. Dear Mr A,
      Five fully-correct solves in under two hours is an aspirational goal that I have achieved only once in 186 attempts. This week I somehow managed to avoid any DNF’s, but my aggregate time of 2 hrs 17 mins (which I’m very pleased with) was still some way off the mark.
      My advice is: Don’t beat yourself up. Forget the clock. Concentrate on solving and parsing every clue correctly. Enjoy the journey.

      1. Thanks Mr R. I have been trying to relax and just concentrate on solving the puzzle, but I find the time very hard to put to one side. I should certainly have forgotten the clock today as thinking about it did me no favours at all.

        Well done this week. There were some tough ones and that is a good time considering the overall difficulty level of the last five QCs.

        PS. Like you, I have achieved five fully correct solves in under two hours just the once!

        1. Actually, my weekly total was 2 hrs 27 mins. A little slower, but I’m still quite happy with it.
          My unofficial target each day is 40 minutes. This week’s score was 4-1, so not bad at all.

          1. That’s a decent scoreline given the difficulty of some of the QCs this week. It’s always satisfying to avoid too many of those very long solves that feel like they will never end.

    2. I think I’ll take your advice and in future avoid reading your ‘contributions’. Self-immolation isn’t pretty, nor needed. The advice you’ve been given, on numerous occasions, is to forget your aspirational times and just enjoy the puzzles. Speed will, perhaps, come over time. No-one here really cares how long you take, and measuring yourself against the long-experienced is futile. Just relax and enjoy life.

  6. 18:31
    An unusual mixture of clues with quite a few biffed, but mostly enjoyable.
    Pleased to be under my 20min target time as I was solving for the first time on my laptop and suffering as King Charles apparently does from sausage fingers!
    FOI: 8ac UNCONDITIONAL
    LOI: 18ac SAUCE
    COD: 4ac CENSUS
    Thanks to Curarist and Hurley and wishing all here a wonderful Christmas.

  7. 11:36, but with one typo 🙁 COD probably INSURGENT. All my other thoughts re SOUR and SPOKE have already been made. If we have a puzzle on Monday, I’ll see you all then. If not, happy Christmas to all.

    Thanks to Hurley and Curarist.

  9. Solved in two sessions. Started off ok in the first one but the second session was marred by a lack of concentration caused by a loud telephone conversation going on nearby. Still, eventually finished with everything correct in a rather sluggish 27 minutes. Couldn’t parse ONE TIME and had a few MERs at some of the definitions, as already mentioned by others.

    FOI – 1ac SINGLE
    LOI – 10ac CRAVE
    COD – nothing really stood out. Liked EXECUTIVE but that’s more a function of having successfully assembled the various parts of the clue – the surface is very clunky.

    Thanks to Hurley and Curarist and a Happy Christmas to all.

  10. A slow start again. FOI was IGNORANCE and relatively few others solved during my first pass. However, one by one they did eventually fall and I crossed the finishing line in 31 minutes. My last few in were CENSUS, SPLASH and SPOKE.

    Overall, I found this quite tricky and I didn’t really like some of the overly wordy clues. A minor quibble really.

    Thanks to Hurley and Curarist.

  11. Got all except SPOKE which I still don’t understand – it’s not in my Collins 2000 (except the etymological origin, from Latin radius = spoke). Nor was S-O-E very helpful; could have been SHONE or SWORE. Curious that you all seem fine with it.

    1. Think of a bicycle wheel.

      SOED:
      ray
      any of several lines radiating from a centre; radius
      Word origin
      C14: from Old French rai, from Latin radius spoke, radius

      I mentioned in my early comment that it was not likely to be known to all, so I’d agree it’s a bit much for a Quick Cryptic.

      1. Thank you, but it doesn’t help: I “think of a bicycle wheel” and immediately what comes to mind is spokes. But never rays. In what context is ray = spoke? The sun gives forth rays of light, but never spokes; a wheel has spokes, but never rays. What can be said to have either?

        1. From Collins,
          SPOKE: 1. a radial member of a wheel, joining the hub to the rim
          2. a radial projection from the rim of a wheel, as in a ship’s wheel
          RADIAL: (of lines, bars, beams of light, etc) emanating from a common central point; arranged like the radii of a circle

          1. I completely agree! The two definitions are incontrovertible. But nowhere does Collins equate spoke with ray.
            Just realised: it’s Friday! Happy Christmas, all.

  12. For me, hard but fair and happily finished in just over 30 mins. Good QC for this SCC member.

  13. 15d..police officer = DI. Then helicopter = ving (a type of helicopter). Losing height therefore = diving.

    Top half was lovely and quick. Bottom half saw sauce, spoke and debtor then ground to a half and unable to finish.

    Rent for Rip?!
    One time was terribly clued I thought and I didn’t have the right workforce to build executive.
    But I should have spotted the hidden.

    Thanks for QC and blog.

  14. 13 mins…

    A little late with this, but a fairly reasonable puzzle from Hurley to lead us into the festive period. Nothing specific stood out, although I did wonder about “spoke” = “ray” for a while.

    FOI – 1ac “Single”
    LOI – 19ac “Perfectionist”
    COD – 14dn “Naïveté”

    Thanks as usual, and best wishes to everyone for Christmas.

Comments are closed.