We’re back round to Chris Feetenby again. I took about 40 minutes in total. As so often, three-quarters of the puzzle was done in about 15 mins, and the last 9 or so clues took the rest of the time. Let’s save a bit of time here by stealing a bit of notation from elsewhere – * means “anagram”. If you don’t object, we might start using it for other reports.
Across | |
---|---|
1 | WHIPPING,POST – the punishment as well as its location |
10 | MEGA=game*,LOB,LAST |
13 | NAARTJE = Trajan*,E – an Afrikaans word for a small orange, so we’re actually in South Africa. |
14 | TURDOID – rut rev., O in DID. Note careful avoidance of excrement … |
16 | A,B=black,B=mark,O.T.=Old Testament = illiberal as in “Father X was a bit Old Testament”. Can’t recall seeing mark=B (or A,C,D,E,maybe F I guess) but I like it. |
19 | NE(GRILL)O – GRILL in one* |
21 | AERO,GRAM=marg. rev. Non-UK solvers: Aero is a type of chocolate. |
25 | OIDIA – hidden – “the conidial stage of the vine-mildew and other fungi” if that helps much, and, I see, an anag. of IAIDO – which now has a much better def in C – used to be “A Japanese form of fencing” – swordplay, garden boundaries or stolen goods? The first, it turns out. |
29 | i.(C)e.,HILL=weather – both mean to make a slope. |
30 | ERIODENDRON = (redden on Rio)* |
31 | ELECTRO(=electroplate),MET,Ry. |
Down | |
2 | H.E.,CUBA – could maybe have been “Our man in Havana” too … |
4 | PA,EDOM,ORPHIC=esoteric |
7 | PARA,SITICIDE – I in (it’s iced)* |
8 | OSTIO=(is too)*,LE(t) |
9 | TREE,TO,MATO=atom* |
12 | STAL(ACT IT)E – a “hanging” in a cave. |
18 | U(ROME)RE – segment of arthropod body |
22 | GALIOT – rev. of (OIL in TAG) |
28 | AIRT – initial letters. Just as I was thinking we’d got through a whole puzzle without using any of those funky Scots words! |
Weekend round-up
Times 23,456 7:17
as far as I can tell, no chance was taken to mark this notable puzzle number. By my reckoning, the next “sequence of five”, 34567, will come up in about May 2042. I may still be here to see it.
Indie 6275 (Monk) 15:55 – includes a little bonus for those in the same place as Monk today.
Guardian 23,933 (Araucaria) 16:20 – clever theme, and a devious little red herring to put you off the scent. Attributed to the spooky-sounding “Auracaria” on the Grauniad xwd site!
Times Jumbo 670 17:40
A good day for xwd site mistakes – the Times site has the wrong grid. Three ways to fix it:
- Print their grid and black out the square where 7D and 19A intersect, plus its 3 symmetrical buddies – 90-degree rotational symmetry in this as in many jumbo grids. Then fix up all the numbers higher than 21 with fine-point red pen or similar.
- If you have suitable squared paper (or you’re a whizz with tables in your word processor), you can make your own fairly easily with some grid nous and these facts:
- 90-degree rotational symmetry
- all answers are on odd-numbered rows/cols.
- Except for the top row and its 3 symmetry buddies, the blocks are “minimal” – a row with 2 answers has 22 white squares, and a row with 3 has 21. The top row starts with two successive blocks, so 1A starts in column 3.
- A more tedious method: the Jumbo apparently now uses a set of stock grids like the daily puzzle, so if you look through old Jumbos in the archive, this grid is almost certainly in there somewhere. If you do this, post a comment here with the puzzle number!
I suppose they’ll fix both problems tomorrow, but what a nuisance…
< for reversal
and
@ for homophone
too? With a little imagination, the “at” sign looks
like an ear! At least it does in the font in which
i’m typing this.
Monk
So far I’ve noted:
– all CAPS for answer components.
– fodder* for anagram(fodder)
– ANSWER=”anser” for homophones
– anything else?
NMS
My guess is that “rev.” doesn’t really need explaining – if you can see the answer and the reversed stuff with “rev.” next to it, it’s pretty obvious. Or at least it was to me when I first saw it …
In general I seem to find Chris Feetenby the most generous of the Mephisto triumvirate, while Mike Laws’s puzzles tend to give me more trouble than Tim Moorey’s.
I too had the BLOT minus L breakdown for ABBOT, and as I think CF is more “liberal” with his cluing than TM or ML, it would not surpise me if that was the intention.
Can’t remember what I thought about ICEHILL, but I do like talbinho’s idea – that’s very neat (and deceptive) wordplay.
Mark = B etc.: I’m less bothered then some by “note” (even after including tonic sol-fa names in the list of possibilities). If river, fish, boy and others can all lead to dozens of possibilities, note and mark don’t seem so bad. The real question is: do these “vague” indications actually stop you getting the right answer? In the hands of a good setter, I don’t think so.